Page 1, As it says on the tin...

EASY HEALTH
by


Peter K. Sharpen
(Cert.Ed., Dip.S.E.)

 © 2011
(Please respect)



EASY HEALTH

About the author

The author was born in the U.K. in 1944. He is mostly self-taught, which means that he is not subject to the mores of an education that seeks to propagandise rather than teach how to learn. From an early age, he was a creative person and has self-taught himself to draw, paint, create music, write a couple of novels, short stories, write many articles on all different types of subjects and has written several tomes of poetry.

He has spent over twenty years of his life in Australia but now lives on the European continent in his (always) semi-retirement after having had many 'jobs' but mostly over the last thirty years as a teacher of English and especially of students with disabilities, using his skills as a multi-'handiman' (i.e. teaching hands-on 'living' skills and involved in Work Experience programmes). He is a 'qualified' teacher of English and students with disabilities. He has researched all his subjects for over 50 years.

The author has no interest in 'establishment' or 'orthodox' theories as these are mostly incorrect and have led to the demise of millions of creatures, including the Human. Unless this is corrected, he sees the end of the Human creature by the end of the century unless vaccination programmes and prescription of pharmaceutical medicine and its techniques are curtailed very severely.

If you value your life, I believe this book is a must read. The reader is not asked to agree with the contents herein but to contemplate, discuss, research for his/her self and value what he/she might find. It has taken me over 60 years to accumulate this data and form a reasoned opinion.

In health is the love of self and others. Peter K. Sharpen

Beware the forthright and belligerent, therein may lurk many truths. Peter K. Sharpen

I have a difficulty. I am unable to reconcile what I learned as a truth and later discovered that it was not so. Peter K. Sharpen

'An apple a day keeps the Doctor away'....Old Saying


Disclaimer

This little book does not tout any notions of diets and so forth as most of them do not work because those peddling them have little knowledge of proper nutrition. This is not a moralistic work which claims anything at all except to inform the reader of a differing point of view from the one generally propagandised into you by your previous teachers (whoever they are) and for whatever reason. The reader should be the only one inside his head and making any decisions.

The author states that this work is for educational purposes only (what else!) and that you are the only one who can make a decision. If you trust your 'health' provider (should you need one), then by all means seek their advice for matters of your health. This work will hopefully give you many chances to ask them questions about their care of you (diagnosis, treatment and prognosis) and their 'right' to advise you of it.



Contents
    
1.    First Things First
2.    Pretty Basic Science
3.    A Little Digression
4.    What are Bacteria?
5.    What is a Virus?
6.    Mind and Body
7.    Of Poisons and Toxicity
8.    Of Symptoms and Dis-eases
9.    Of the Killing of Food and Drink
10.    Why does Food go 'Off'?
11.    What Happens when we Die?
12.    What is Wrong with Salt, Sugar and Fat?
13.    Of Pharmaceutical Drugs and Serums
14.    Of Rest, Sunshine, Nutrients and Exercise
15.     Of the 'Medical' Establishment
16.    A Bit of a Rant
17.    A Bit of Advice
18.    Afterword
19.    Questions
End


EASY HEALTH

First Things First

Health comes from Nature not from a bottle or a packet. You cannot bottle sunshine, for example and it the most important mechanism of health. No sunshine, no health. Here is where it begins and ends, full stop.

This little book is not from the 'establishment' and would most likely be banned since it does not conform to the standards of malpractice engaged in by so-called 'health practitioners' which includes doctors, surgeons, pharmacists, dieticians, dentists, psychiatrists, psychologists, vetenarians and any of the plethora of others to whom your actual health is not their concern. Some may mean well but they have not done any homework of their own if they are allowed to practice at all. Those who discovered differently have been anything from ostracised to murdered; that is a truth.

It is your unhealth which is their concern and livelihood. After all, if you were healthy, you would not get sick and would not require their services at all! If you were advised from birth (that is before you were probably stabbed and injected with muck foreign to a human body, that is vaccination) regarding your ability to stay healthy, there would be only a small group of people who could possibly help you in emergencies only. Vaccination is the first step on the path to ill-health as it is based on the false premise of the 'germ' theory, as we shall see.

The creature Man has been around for a very long time before 'modern' medicine and has managed to survive for countless centuries without a pill to pop and so forth. With 'modern' medicine, there are hardly any persons alive who are healthy. 'Modern' medicine does not keep you healthy, help you to stay healthy, or indeed anything else other than treat any 'symptoms' and at the same time, you will probably present more 'symptoms' due to their 'treatment'. (To say a person died of cancer treatment (for example) would be more accurate than to say that a person died from a cancer, in point of fact).

'Modern' medicine is a scam, sham, hoax and everything else that is negative; it is not about health. It only pretends to be.

'Modern' medicine is the diabolical industrialisation of Shamanism/witchcraft/voodoo and so on for profit. If you believe in nothing a so-called 'doctor' tells you, you could easily remain healthier. If you understood the rudiments of biology and nutrition, you would rarely see a 'doctor' except in emergencies and you should then, if possible, only accept Natural processes.

I am not denying the good deeds people have done. I am not denying the earnest endeavours of certain individuals who would and do seek to help individuals who have forgotten (or not been told) about their nutrition and its importance. All this was accomplished by the family at one time. Who has not been told: 'Don't eat that, it will make you sick!'

The doctors of 'modern' medicine are not versed in even the rudiments of nutritional science, so how can they guide you to a healthy life? It is likely 'on the cards' that the notion of nutrition itself will be outlawed; this is not an idle jest.

If you should wish to research of the notions herein, please be advised that little of it will be in 'standard' literature and you will have to search further afield. If you have an Internet connection, this is where to start. It will be a rewarding journey and your best souvenir will be your health regained should you have lost it.



Pretty Basic Science

I am not interested what you say or feel about the this statement but Man is an animal or creature.

A multi-cellular creature is pretty much an alimentary canal surrounded by some sort of body which allows it to ingest 'food' or 'nutrients' and excrete the remnants of same after it has drawn its necessary requirements to keep functioning as an alimentary canal. If that sounds awful, too bad. Nature does not have morals, She does what She does. A study of embryology bears out the preceding statements. It is basic input/output. Eat to live and not live to eat, as they say.

To function at all, any creature (or plant) requires nutrients. Let us a take an example from the world outside that of a creature: your car. The car is a mechanical alimentary canal from the petrol tank, through the engine and out of the exhaust and surrounded by the rest of it, that ingests nutrients (fuel, oxygen) so that it can work. If your car is petrol, it will require petrol. If that petrol is 95 octane and you feed it 95 octane, it will work. If you feed it 98 octane or diesel it will not work properly or not at all, at least, not for long!

Different creatures require different nutrients to stay 'alive' (whatever that may be). The quantity will vary with each different creature as will the specific requirements for its 'aliveness'. In varying degrees, each creature is only aware of its requirements and solves problems to feed themselves; that is their nature and seems to work very well, given they they have been around for a very long time.

All creatures (apart from 'modern' Man it seems) have found the ability to 'nutrify' themselves for an existence far longer than Man (and far longer if the present state of health of the creature Man is concerned).

Anyway, to live or exist, we must intake the correct nutrients and expel what is not required. If this is done in an efficient and supportive way to the system, we remain healthy. Healthy is free from damage or compromise to our terrain.

Terrain is the body that surrounds and includes the alimentary canal. Please remember that all creatures are basically an alimentary canal to process nutrients to keep it functioning. Terrain is also the ground or earth and air (and indeed the whole of the Universe)from which we derive the nutrients.

Therefore, it is the maintenance of the terrain which keeps us healthy and 'alive'.

Nature provides all our necessities. That is her job and she does it well or we would not be here at all! Only Man deems it necessary to try to 'improve' on Nature. Ego ad infinitum.

To retain health (and awareness of being aware) is to embrace the natural and not the fake. Man created fake, Nature did not.

The Universe is not made up of discrete particles. Everything is connected to everything else in some way. The reason that we particularise is so that we can communicate a description of something. Although we appear to have an understanding of something, we can  never 'know' anything. This is the limitation of language. There are many levels to language as there are to everything in the Universe. Everything is a continuum in a push-pull electro-chemical (or plasma) Universe. The universe is not some form of clockwork mechanism it is always and forever changing from one state to another in what we call a continuum. Everything is part of that continuum without exception.

So far as health is concerned, as Florence Nightingale (for one) observed, there are no specific diseases, only specific conditions for what we call disease, or as would be more correct, dis-ease. This statement alone, negates and precedes the so-called 'germ' theory of dis-ease. 'borrowed' (to be kind) by the chemist Louis Pasteur.

The world is not full of bugs 'out there', which are determined to make us sick and which we 'catch' by some miraculous means. This is a Nonsense Tale and patently untrue since if there were pathological 'bugs' waiting the 'invade', none of us would be here!  The cost alone of buying anti-this and anti-that to destroy something that is not there is enormous and would be better spent on nutritious food.

'Modern' medicine is determined and designed, I may add, to make us believe that these 'bugs' exist. They call them 'germs'. This is the basis of the 'Germ' Theory. Note the word 'theory'. There has never been any actual proof of these 'germs'. What people show you as 'germs' are merely remnants of cellular material that are to be got rid of by the self-healing mechanisms of the body and the degree to which they are eliminated is determined by the terrain of the body and its proper maintenance.

Instead of studying the healthy terrain of a non-sick individual, 'modern' medicine studies the sick to find out why they are so indisposed. This is completely the wrong way round!


A Little Digression

    This inversion is notable in the theory (that word again!) that there is a 'virus' which causes what is called A.I.D.S. The general belief is that when a virus invades the body, anti-bodies appear by magic to try to destroy the virus so that it can not harm one.

    Now, older science claimed that once the anti-bodies have been produced, one was 'immune' from the disease which causes it.

    Later science, especially with A.I.D.S. now demands that we believe that if you 'test positive' for these said anti-bodies, you have the disease! How can you believe anything these people say?


What are Bacteria?

What bacteria are not, are any sort 'bugs' going around that are waiting in the wings to invade your person and make it ill. This is not even a clever Nonsense Story. It is a patently obvious Nonsense Story; the language of 'modern' medicine.

We seem to be entrenched in the notion that bacteria (and viruses, if they exist...and the jury should still be out on that one until the evidence is available to all) are some sort of living creatures, each with a specific disease to impart on other creatures. This is what the medical establishment want you to believe. They even have artists draw pretty pictures of these to try to prove their credibility. Possibly they wave little banners proclaiming: 'Here comes your 'flu, baby!'

Bacteria are created by and in living terrain, whether land or an organism, when they are required, end of story.

Bacteria are scavengers for useless, dead or dangerous material from which living material needs to rid itself. That being said, bacteria scavenge ingested food for the purpose of taking the specific nutrients the body requires for maintenance and they eliminate the rest as waste. There is no negative connotation in the word 'scavenger'.

One has to ask why we eat and drink and then eliminate waste in the first place...

Bacteria do not and can not cause dis-ease; they are created in living terrain to prevent dis-ease by ridding the terrain of material causing it to deorganise.

Bacteria are created according to how and when they are required within the living terrain and have the ability to change their form in differing circumstances to suit the removal of useless, dead or toxic material, where possible. They are pleomorphic.

Nature does not create any form of life that is incompatible to its maintenance of living, healthy terrain.

Bacteria are not created outside of living healthy terrain they are created only in response to compromised terrain (according to Nature) or in response to the utilisation of nutrients to maintain that healthy terrain.

Given a healthy environment and the correct materials for self-healing (sun, rest, exercise, and appropriate nutrients), bacteria are not created. When food is ingested, bacteria are created to digest the material and eliminate the waste (that which is not required). After this, they deorganise back into the body into their basic elements. These basic elements (what Béchamp, for example, called microzymas) are the basic element of the life process. They are enzymatic and based on the process of fermentation. An enzyme, as is well known, is an electro-chemical process by which it can cause a reaction without themselves changing; they merely 'band together' to perform certain functions at certain times and in certain circumstances. Once they are 'banded together' (to create a human body, for example) having the correct nutrients and so forth, they will continue to be as they are until their requirements are not met for some reason and they deorganise back to their original form where they stay indestructible until they create something new based on the environment at the time; hence new creatures come and others disappear all the time.

When bacteria are created due to compromised terrain, they undergo many changes until the fungal stage is reached and the compromised terrain deorganises back to its original components or elements back into the earth as discussed in the previous paragraph.

When bacteria have finished their job, the are no longer required or can be found, if indeed they could be found...

Doctors who 'find' or demonstrate bacteria in so-called dis-eased tissue under a microscope are merely looking at the remnants of a healing process, not a dis-ease and not the bacteria as they were working in the body itself. It is all out of context.

A micro-biologist can not demonstrate (and would not admit to finding such if he/she were worth their salt) a bacterium under a regular or electron microscope since whatever living form they may take in the body, they will cease to exist as such outside of it. There have been microscopes devised by certain persons (Béchamp and Royale Rife, Gaston Naessens for instance,) that can view living bacteria but these microscopes have been deliberately faded/destroyed out of existence. You may ask why? because they do not conform to the lucrative 'germ' theory of dis-ease. There are movies available on the Internet that show these microzymas; these are not figments of an imagination; unlike bacterial 'creatures'.


What is a virus?

If a virus exists (and despite what we may have been told, none have ever been demonstrated to exist in live terrain or any other terrain, for that matter) it is purely a substance without any life characteristics. There can be no such thing as 'live', 'dead' or 'attenuated' viruses. This is patent nonsense. All the pictures you see of supposed viruses are and can only be artistic impressions in the fantasy world of 'modern' medicine. Ask for some literature and some forensic evidence. If you find any, it will be unique.

A virus, therefore can not reproduce and can never reproduce and can not, instruct anything else to reproduce. If it did, as we are told, none of us would be here, for who could stop it from doing so? Ask also, if your 'flu' gets better, why is that? It is known that so-called 'anti-biotics' cannot 'kill' or inactivate a 'virus', so what makes it go away?

The answer, is purely and simply a nutritional diet, rest, exercise, an adequate amount of sunlight (or vitamin D3 supplements of 5000mg per day, at least) and large amounts of Vitamin C (over 1000mg per dose). Since the body does not store Vitamin C, you can not overdose on it, contrary to what you may have been told by those with a vested interest in selling worthless products, especially 'over-the-counter' ones (the ones that claim: 'Contains Vitamin C').

What may be demonstrated as a virus is not any form of living organism (since a virus is not 'living' according to the 'official' definition, I might add) but merely a piece of detritus produced within the cell; there is no biological way that a virus can 'invade' a cell and 'tell' it to reproduce itself and 'infect' more cells and needs to be 'killed' or anything else. Note the 'war' on germs and the military language!

The notion that a bacterium or virus (if it exists) causes disease is entirely fallacious and there is no forensic evidence yet produced that demonstrates this either in the laboratory or certainly not in the living terrain. I defy you to find positive evidence from the so-called 'authorities'.

The so-called 'germ' theory of disease is entirely spurious and is just that, a theory and that never proven nor likely to be. The opposite, however, is the fact that we get 'well' otherwise than doctor-fed medication.

A healthy terrain never gets dis-eased.

The reason that people get ill/sick/dis-eased is because they are either not acquiring the nutrients they require or they are not taking enough. They may even be taking too much of something.

I repeat, neither viruses nor bacteria can be studied outside of the body as they are only created inside a living creature (or terrain). As soon as you remove them (if it were possible), they would not be what they once were and would therefore be useless to study.

The reason 'modern' medicine is so successful (for the practitioners only) is that it is relying on your fear of the unknown and unseeable, since neither 'bacteria' or 'viruses' are demonstrable. If you can see something with the naked eye, it is demonstrable and you can take action. However, if you can't see it but are told often enough that something exists, you may eventually believe it. Such is the power of suggestion and these practicioners know that very well. It is called propaganda.



Mind and Body

The body is a complete device. It cannot be separated into various parts and put back together again. It is self-healing as long as it gets the correct nutrients and bar accidents or deliberate poisoning, it will last for a very long time.

I believe that all multi-cellular creatures have some sort of mind in some varying form and degree. The Human has a mind and a body. They work together and can not be separated biologically or for descriptive purposes. The Human brain directs all bodily functions because that is its job. This is basic biology and may not be argued against to a satisfactory conclusion.

The body is holistic (or whole-body) and will only remain healthy (should it become unhealthy) through the use of natural holistic treatment. Anything else just does not nor will not work. 'Modern' medicine can only hope to try to relieve symptoms (the healing process), it can not 'cure' because it knows nothing about the workings of the body, despite whatever their literature might try to tell you. 'Modern' medicine, kills the healing and the 'cure'.



Of poisons and toxicity

A poison is a substance which ingested by a body causes it to become compromised. For example, the venom of a particular snake (spider or other creature) is not a natural substance when ingested by a Human creature. The body will try to eliminate this venom as best it can but it may be overwhelmed by it and cause trauma for the creature to the point of loss of consciousness and death.

This venom is injected into a body via the snake's fangs. By injection, the poison is injected directly into the blood-stream which carries it around the body. If it can't bite you, you can't be poisoned by it. The actual puncturing of the skin will cause the brain to send messages out to all parts of the body and cause what we call shock. Depending on the quality of the terrain of the individual creature, will be the seriousness of the shock, even so far as death (anaphalytic shock).

This same effect is produced by the vaccination scam (Remember the fake 'germ' theory; for every 'dis-ease' a specific pathogen is required). Foreign proteins (from non-human creatures), along with other known toxic substances (mercury, aluminium, aspartame, for example) are deliberately  injected into healthy individuals (usually without their consent to this surgical procedure, especially newborn babies) for the purpose of preventing dis-ease that will never happen if the individual remains healthy in mind and body. There can be no excuse for going on about being in loco parentis, especially since the theory is just that and no evidence of vaccination doing any good has ever been recorded, only the contrary...

Vaccination with one dose of whatever it is they inject is bad enough. Now, practitioners insist on using multiple doses (as in MMR). The devastation this causes the terrain is enormous, especially in the new-born. Also, there is no respect of the quantity for each individual, it is a 'one dose fits all' scenario. The whole process is insane, pure and simple. The vast increases in allergies is the result of vaccination. The foreign proteins and other filth that is injected come from sources foreign to the human terrain. The body cannot significantly ward off the devastation. Epidemics (so-called) are the result of mass vaccinations, often mandatory ( Human Rights problem). This fact is now becoming increasingly known; not that you would believe it.

If you can not demonstrate a virus, then how could you possibly create a 'vaccine' for it? Increasingly, also, is the fact that these 'vaccines' are not even tested for anything, leastwise efficacy and not doing any harm (the first tenet of the Hypocratic oath promo non nocare).

In medical matters, we are  in The New Dark Ages. The reader might well do some intimate homework of his own, don't take my word (or anyone else's) as to the truth behind my statements. We would like to trust those who purport to want to help us, unfortunately, one can't and that is a sad fact.

Of symptoms and dis-eases

There is no doubt that when we feel unwell, we want to feel better. A 'simple' head-ache is a symptom that the body is not as it should be. It hurts and we want rid of it.  Symptoms, however, are not indicative of dis-ease! This may sound astounding and will be rejected by many as the meanderings of a crazed mind. However, bear with me for a moment.

There is an old saying, which goes something like this: 'The nastier a medicine tastes, the more it does you good', or some-such. There may indeed be some truth in this is you remember that symptoms are a sign of healing, not illness. Pain (nasty medicine) is the response of the body to make it aware that all is not well and is an alarm-call, if you like, to tell you to do something about it. It is one of Nature's alarm-calls that aids your survival.

The body, given the correct nutrients and so on is a self-healing product of Nature with a life-time guarantee. This does not mean it is a painless or comfortable process (because Nature has no knowledge of that) but it does mean that one has to work for the relief, not rely on some outside drugs or whatever to void the head-ache, or whatever.

When you have a very heavy day, for some reason or another, it takes at least another day before you really feel tired, for example. The body, however, without your direct knowledge, has already put in place a mechanism (if you will) to accommodate the over-activity. It starts to make you feel tired a day later because it is trying to heal the fact that you over-did whatever it was.

The symptoms of 'tiredness', for example, make you want to rest so that you can feel better after it. One would feel that this was stating the obvious.

A 'common cold', for example is the healing process derived from a number of prior incidents lack of sun, nutrients, rest and exercise that bring about a sore-throat, cough, and so forth and make you feel ill. These are the symptoms of healing, not the catching of some amorphous, non-existent 'germ' that is 'going round' and you have 'caught'. One could only invent such a wicked tale as this. Apart from going to Doctor, most people will feel unwell and buy over-the-counter potions that contain...Vitamin C! The answer is there. What is Vitamin C? Without the technicalities, it is something your body needs but wasn't getting. So, the PTB (Powers That Be) know this to be true otherwise you would not find it on the shelves or on the prescription pad of Doctor. The actual amount of Vitamin C is minuscule; the labeling would better read 'Contains the word Vitamin C'.

The symptoms revealed that you were not getting enough nutrients. The body was crying out for them but...nothing; the ears are deaf to the body's call...

As far as I know, Grandma (presumably before the Germ Theory Tale appeared (or she got wind of it), would advocate, fresh air and some warm broth (which contained a good dose of the stuff you lacked (hence your 'cold')). Granny had some good and honest sense, may she rest in peace.

We need to look only at the individual's terrain. If the terrain is healthy, there is no 'cold' and certainly not any 'flu!

If the terrain is compromised (lack of sun, lack of correct nutrients, worries and fears and so forth) the body attempts to heal itself. It needs to get rid of something that is causing it grief. The body is trying to eliminate the compromised body by coughing, sneezing, skin rashes, pustules and so forth. The 'symptoms' are those of healing, not dis-ease. This notion is, of course, contrary to what most people believe, even the medical profession!

Nearly every labeled dis-ease has the same symptoms in some way at the beginning. Just take a look at some common diseases at the library or on the Internet.

The body works best when it is in balance of input/output. It works when the whole body is in a slightly alkaline state (basic biology). Most of us eat and drink far too many acid-producing substances. The alimentary canal produces bacteria when it receives food or drink. When the nutrients are removed for use by the body, what is left is to be eliminated. If the bacteria are overwhelmed by acidic food the result is what we call 'heartburn'.

The stomach does not produce hydrochloric acid to break down the food. Digestion (which starts in the mouth) is a by-product of bacterial action. Acid is a by-product of digestion because the gut bacteria are having a hard time with food that is too acidic. Basic science reveals that you do not add water to acid as this causes a very strong reaction; one always adds acid to water. Drinking anything acidic if you have 'heartburn' is very silly as it makes it worse. The only thing to do is to neutralise the acid by the use of sodium bicarbonate or something naturally available which serves the same purpose. Sodium bicarbonate is not the same as baking powder, by the way. Baking powder contains other things that you do not want. Any other form of 'medicinal' 'indigestion' substance/tablet is a definite no-no.

Saliva is alkaline. This is the beginning of digestion; to make the food alkaline for the bacteria (intestinal flora) to break down the food for nutrients and eliminate the waste. A quick way to solve acidic problems of digestion is to make a lot of saliva in the mouth and swallow it.

As an aside, never drink water containing fluoride if you can avoid it. The fluoride placed (illegally, but declared legal) in water treatment is a by-product of the aluminium smelting industry. It is not natural fluoride sometimes found in some well-water, for example (which is water-soluble but still not potentially healthy). Neither brush your teeth with a fluoride toothpaste as this is potentially harmful, especially if swallowed and children's toothpaste is now labeled (I believe) to that effect.

Some fluoride is retained in the body and there is evidence that long-term use can make bones brittle, especially in the elderly. Again, do not take my word for it; look up the consequences of fluoride dangers yourself. The fluoride story makes another sickening tale in the quest for ill-health; pun intended.


Of the killing of food and drink

Most food sold in shops has little nutritional value. Most of this 'food' would probably have the same amount of nutrients as the packaging! A great deal needs to be consumed (and eliminated as useless by the body) to get the correct value for health. The consumption of vast quantities for this purpose is a strain on the whole organism, mind and body. The body does not require a great deal of nutrients, especially when there is ample sunshine (even if it may be a cool day). You get hungry because the body needs nutrients, not for indigestible lumps of fodder. You can train the stomach to eat less quantity of food but not a lack of quality nutrients.

Most food is factory processed and nutrients need to be added to food (usually laboratory-made) to make up requirements. Most manufactured cooking oils, for example are rancid on the shelves; they only look palatable. Their nutritional value is probably in the negative. Only two oils serve the correct requirements: hand mechanically expressed virgin olive oil and coconut oil. These need to be carefully used to get their full nutritional values and should not be overheated.

Pasteurisation

This is one of my pet dislikes. Louis Pasteur 'borrowed' (to be kind again) the notion of the 'Germ' Theory and managed to convince the nutritionally challenged that 'germs' caused diseases and that specific 'germs' caused specific diseases. It sounded good but was ever a theory and Pasteur himself is reported to have recanted this theory in his last moments before de-organising back into the earth from whence he came.

Given that milk (especially cows' milk) is staple to most of mankind (and is the basis for cheese, butter and so on) contains bacteria (allegedly), these need to be eliminated and high heat treatment is used to destroy them (because milk eventually loses any life it had and goes 'sour'). Thus was invented the unnatural process of Pasteurisation and the beginning of the killing of food.

Raw milk (unpasteurised) is very hard to purchase. It is not generally available because it does have to be consumed within reasonable sight of the purchaser. It cannot, by law, be sold in supermarkets (in the UK, for example). However, it is known readily that raw milk actually stores longer than Pasteurised milk! However, some-one makes money from the process (or for some other, possibly nefarious reason), so there goes your health! Raw milk is much of a 'whole' food and contains many vital nutrients. These are all damaged/destroyed by the Pasteurisation process. Milk you buy in regular shops is also mostly homogenised. This means the natural fat in the milk (which is healthy and essential) is battered until it no longer remains a healthy fat, if a fat at all. Any skimmed or semi-skimmed milk is of no nutritional value whatsoever and is more likely to lead to ill health. Soy milk and other soy products unless specially fermented are an unnatural product for consumption by any living creature.

In my view, pasteurisation is an abomination to Nature.


What happens when we die?

When we 'die', we lose the consciousness of being alive. We can no longer ingest nutrients (at least in the same way). We can keep an unconscious body alive with a machine feeding nutrients but eventually that will not be enough. No pharmaceutical drugs can never keep a person alive.

The body then still attempts to heal itself but that will fail eventually and the body will be consumed by the bacteria until nothing is left except the elements that make up a bacterium. Dust, if you will, to dust (Béchamp's microzymas). It is known that hair and fingernails (which provide decent fodder for the 'zombie' movies) will grow long after death. That is because they are still using up the nutrients left in the body after its loss of consciousness and other anti-revival/self-healing properties.

The fresher (the closest to a natural state) that we can get to eating food (both us and the food), the more its nutritional value. Freezing food is of course one way of keeping food fresher and I see no problem in using frozen food for nutrients, which is in a kind of suspended animation, as it were. We know it works.

Adding anything unnatural to food is always a no-no. We have been led to believe that certain foods should be have a certain look about them ('A' class, 'B' class, etc.). For example, an apple must (apparently) be a certain, size, shape, colour, be unblemished and so forth for the 'consumer'. How many of this wonderful fruit are wasted for this titillation! In fact I learned quite recently that when bananas go a little brown, they have more natural sugars and are healthier than the whitish fruit most of us are used to!

The notion of peeling many fruit and vegetables is often spurious and needs to be researched. It should be remembered that most of the nutrients lay just under the surface of the peel (vitamins, for example). Removing the peel, often removes a great deal of the nutrients. Most peeling is done for cosmetic reasons only and this is not always necessary. Caution is advised. Over-cooking is also ill-advised in lots of cases but that is food for thought...


What is wrong with salt and sugar?

Salt is an important element. Like everything else it should be natural (not iodised) and preferably sun-dried sea salt (which I believe is pinkish in colour). Not to be over used, of course. The preoccupation with low salt is not recommended as people try to avoid it when it may be necessary. Do not believe the popular hype, especially from 'health' practitioners.

Likewise with sugar. As little processed as possible and sparingly used. Magnesium helps to regulate sugar balance in the body and most soils are deficient by over-farming and the addition of 'fertilisers'.

What is wrong with fat?

There are, according to popular belief, two kinds of fat but that can be only for descriptive purposes but I am not going to argue that. These are what we are told are the 'saturated' fats and the 'unsaturated' fats. Saturated fats are part of living processes. Unsaturated fats are generally from manufactured 'food' and oils. Saturated fats do not make you fat and eating them is essential for maintaining a healthy terrain. Again, the poison (as it were) is in the dose. Unsaturated fats should not be part of any diet unless you want to become (or stay) unhealthy. Unsaturated fats are in all regular cooking oils, fake butters and margarines; avoid them where possible. Saturated fats occur in mainly meat products. Man has adapted to be a meat and a vegetable eater, any other argument is not worth having for reasons of sanity.


Of pharmaceutical drugs and serums

Unless created from natural products compliant with the human (and other) creature's natural terrain, all pharmaceutical products are potentially toxic and or harmful. This isn't what the medical profession, the cosmetic industry or the anti-bacterial lobby would have you believe, of course!

Serums created from non-human (or even human) creatures are not compatible with health in the human. It has been argued that more than 80% of pharmaceutical drugs do not even work. This is not surprising if you consider they are manufactured based on the false 'germ' theory, a limited number of chemicals and the algorithms from which pharmaceutical drugs are put together. The notion is to keep putting chemicals together, creating some sort of pill or serum and finding something in ill-health (or inventing a 'new' disease, virus, or whatever) from which they can make money trying to 'cure' it without litigation. By the way, one is no longer, in many countries, able to sue pharmaceutical companies if you get sick or die from their vaccines! How is that for medical progress?

These people will even create new dis-eases for which their 'wonder' drug will bring relief (nearly always in a few years time, by the way). This is especially true of the psychiatric industry, who produce volumes of stuff that would make a competent liar blush. They create 'mind' problems such that you have, for example, a 'chemical imbalance' because you have I.N.S.S.  In their pithy, acronymic way this means that you are sick because you have this disease (that they have plucked from the most rarefied of atmospheres). The acronym means I'm Not Sick Syndrome. 'Have heart, my dear chap. Here is a pill to help you'. (Never mind is will cause you all sorts of grief).  'And by the way, here is the account for my fee...'

Also, if all so-called diseases emanate from the same problem (unhealthy life-style through lack of sun and nutrients) then there is little point in trying to eliminate 'symptoms' if they are, in fact, the healing process itself.

Anti-biotics are just that, they are anti-life. That is what the word means. They kill the bacteria (in whatever form they take at any given moment during the healing process) and stop them from their work. Even if there were 'good' and 'bad' bacteria, anti-biotics would and do not discriminate. It is a well-know truism that if you leave a 'cold' alone, it lasts for a few days. If you take anti-biotics, it will last much longer. This stands to reason because the bacteria have to get rid of the anti-biotic before they can continue their work! Better you listen to a great-grandmother's platitudes, if she is still alive, which she probably may be because she took her own advice!

I mentioned previously, that psychiatrists are insisting that any mental aberration (whatever that is)  is 'caused' by a 'chemical imbalance'. This was an invention because psychiatrists/psychologists have no idea how the brain works in reality and they desperately need to make out that their co-called professions has some 'scientific' validity. Just exactly what this 'chemical imbalance' is (or 'scientific validity' for that matter), they have no idea but they insist on trying manufactured drugs (one after the other, in the hope something will happen positively quite soon, for fear of litigation) to try to rectify this nonsense. Here the Guinea-pig patient is desperately trying to find a decent placebo effect, at least). Most 'good' (if there are any) psychiatrists will also admit that they don't know what they are talking about at all. If any of their therapy actually made a 'patient' feel better it was because some-one had taken the trouble to listen to them. I think it is called TLC (tender loving care).

I am afraid that 'modern' medicine practiced by some-one not 'qualified' by the Establishment would be guilty of a criminal act.


Of rest, sunshine, nutrients and exercise

    Getting enough rest is essential for health. If you need an alarm-clock to rise in the morning, you are not getting enough rest or resting at the incorrect time. What rest you need is for you to decide as we are all different and if you were 'average' you would be unique.

Man was born of sunshine. You would think Australians for example, (and I have spent over twenty years of my life there) would be the healthy bronzed individuals you see on propaganda posters. Not true. They are as unhealthy as anyone else. The reason is that they are led to believe that the sun causes all sorts of problems even cancer! This is utter nonsense. Therefore, they shy from the sun. They cover the largest organ of the body (the skin), slap on manufactured chemicals called sun-screen and expect to be healthy.

I had a job in the 60's working for an oil exploration company in Western Australia. I worked 14 hours a day some-times in a desert, or salt lake. I never wore a hat, nor put anything on my skin. I never burned at all because I managed how I spent time in the sun (and yes, I worked as hard as anyone).

If you want to argue melanomas then please be aware that they occur in most areas of the body that never get the sun, however much you indulge it.

Sunshine produces (amongst other things) the hormone D3 (a.k.a. Vitamin D3). This is essential for all running processes in the body as is cholesterol...the apparent local 'bad guy' of the last couple of centuries. Lack of it causes all sorts of ill-health. If you live in areas where there is insufficient sunlight you will need to take a supplement of D3 but it must be adequate. Forget all the 'recommended' doses, they are useless and designed to be. You cannot overdose on D3. Twenty minutes of full-body sunlight would give a conservative 10,000mg D3, I believe. In winter in the UK, I take 2 x5000mg almost every day. I never get 'colds' or other forms of ill-health.

    Nutrients include all the vitamins and a lot of minerals (magnesium, chromium, iron, zinc, calcium and so on). Unfortunately, the soils in which most food is grown (including a lot of 'organic') are depleted in essential minerals. This means that your 'healthy' cabbages (for example) may not contain all the minerals and vitamins they once might have done. It is essential, therefore to take some supplementation.

Magnesium (as in Epsom salts B.P.) is very lacking in most diets, even of healthy people. It is an essential element in every cell of the body since it regulates sugar conversion (from which we get our energy). I used to have a problem with anxiety attacks (some quite severe) until I realised that I had a 'sugar' problem. I did my research and learned about magnesium. Since I have been taking about 1/3 teaspoon of Epsom salts (B.P. or British Pharmacopoeia), I have had no problems over the last three years. Those labeled 'diabetic' would be well advised to research this vital element for themselves as it is little understood (like most ill-health) by 'health' practitioners.

Vitamin C should also be taken in doses of at least 1000mg and even 10,000mg would not cause problems. Megadoses are given by some 'Natural health' practitioners for certain complaints. Forget the DRD (daily recommended dose).

Natural cider vinegar is incredible (it is not acidic in the stomach). Do your own research; I could fill another book on its merits.

Hemp oil is a 'whole food' oil. It is created from Industrial Hemp (that means it can not get you 'high' and does not mean it is used as a sort of engine oil!). 1000mg per day will help all functions of the body as is masterful for helping no-so-good joints. Hemp oil contains as least 3 different 'omega' oils, 3,6, and 9.  These work together to perform much more than just the 'fad': 'Contains Omega 3 Oils!' currently doing the rounds. However, fish oil is perfectly fine. My mother gave us children a spoonful of Cod Liver Oil, a small Vitamin C capsule every day and often a spoonful of malt. This was way back in the late 1940's. We also had Gold Top milk, which although pasteurised, contained saturated fats. We were rarely ill.

Hemp oil/capsules are difficult to get unless you persist.

Those items listed above are only the tip of the iceberg. I am not asking for you to hit the iceberg but to scout around it.

A word of warning. A great number of vitamins are produced in the chemical laboratories. They 'simulate' natural vitamins (such as those found in fruit) but they are not the same. If you eat an apple, for example, all the nutrients work together (otherwise it wouldn't be an apple, it would be something else). If you remove any one of the vitamins and process it, even if you put them back together, they will never produce the same effect as the original fruit. One needs to carefully source where one is getting their vitamins and minerals. 'Whole' foods (for example, apples) will give you a proper 'dose'. Oils such as hemp oil, coconut oil provide a whole food. So does raw milk, when and if you can get it. There are many 'whole' foods and you can search for them yourself. There are many charlatans out there apart from 'doctors'. One does not want to be part of an Industry where health is concerned, at least.

The medical profession and their minders are not willing for you to take these supplements because if you were healthy, you would not need them and they would lose their livelihood and have to get a 'real' job. You must therefore persist in your quest and remember that health is not as expensive as hospitalisation is (in many ways, not the least of it your health!).

Exercise is also important. This does not mean going to a gym and 'working out' and paying hard earned money for the privilege of watching those (probably unhealthy) individuals who can walk, run, lift and other things that you are unable to. It merely means that you need to engage in some form of physical activity; it really doesn't matter what it is or for how long you pursue it. It merely means that you engage in it with a positive 'air'. It must not be hard work to exercise otherwise it is of no use to your mental state. If a holiday causes you griefs, then it has no value. Walking is much better for the body than 'jogging'. Time does not matter, it is a Human concept, not a natural one. Aching joints need rest and exercise and a good regular dose of hemp oil would not go amiss.

Something often missing when health issues are mentioned is what is called a 'sense of humour'. We do not know if other animals exhibit this phenomenon but Humans certainly do to a large extent. A sense of humour is the ability to laugh and make others do so. It is an essential part of the quality of life, otherwise it would not exist at all, one feels. It should be used freely as much as possible. Putting others 'down' for a laugh, however, is not a sense of humour, it is bullying.


Of the 'medical' establishment

The 'medical establishment' is just that. Established by themselves via their control of everything you read from them and in your lack of data to the contrary wish/want/need to overcome the fear of an illness... Their only vested interest is their making of a lucrative living from your ill-health, their personal prestige or control of others' behaviours. Their 'interest' is not in your health, merely the means by which they make their quirky living.

It may be distasteful to say all that but ask yourself when 'Doctor' ever helped you through your 'illness' and prescribed a good dose of sunlight and nutritious food, for example. The apt expression 'An apple a day...' comes to mind.

You cannot fight the whole of this 'establishment' because it is, in a word, established or indeed entrenched. To be quite cynical, there is a 'War on Health' and you are in the trenches. Note they are below ground. The only way to 'beat the system' is to take personal control, be educated (as I have hope this little volume may have done a little) and ask questions* of them as to their efficacy in their ministrations. It really is your responsibility, not some-one else's, especially where there are younger or older people involved who may not understand the implication of these ministrations of potions, poor advice and ill-treatment (pun intended).

* Will it (this pill, procedure) work?
* What is the real reason for my illness?
* What is in the pill/procedure that will make me healthy for the future?
* What 'side-effects' may be encountered?
* Why will this pill/procedure work if carried out?
* What are the long-term benefits (prognosis) of this pill/procedure?

These are too few questions to ask, yet these (and more) are the only armoury (since it is a War) against the traditional and spurious 'germ' theory of dis-ease. By asking 'telling' questions, we have only just a hope of sensible answers and possible treatment.

If any answers are not forthcoming in the positive, one can only say No! to any pill/treatment/procedure to which you are required to subject yourself.


A bit of a rant
Humour is on the way out but not lost. Peter K. Sharpen

The art of the family doctor has mostly been lost. It has been said that there are two Gods. The religious one who is always called 'God' and there is the time when you might go to the Health Clinic/Center (church) and the receptionist will not say: 'God will see you now' but she will undoubtedly say: 'Doctor will see you now.' Not 'a' doctor, not 'the' doctor, but this god-like figure Doctor. Make sure you take your prayer-mat and know the direction of Mecca.

Doctor now works in collaboration with a few others, equally untrained in nutritional science. They work in a 'clinic'. They all have a 'discipline', that is, they all have their various areas of 'expertise'. The nurse, the pathologist, the radiographer and so on interminably. They do not work together but only as a 'team', complete with Mission Statement. They do not speak the same language since all the disciplines have their own special language.

You might see any one of these 'medical' people  during a required whole-day visit reading all the posters in the waiting room and the latest scientific medical achievements/miracle drugs as related by the professional scientific reporters of the 'Daily Mail' (for example). However, all these miracle cures will be at least 'Five years away' or 'around the corner'. You will probably have Doctor's name but you won't get to see him as he will be away being coaxed by some drug company to push their latest ill-conceived wares. You may see a locum, who doesn't know a thing about you but is as capable as 'your' doctor of writing illegibly on a pad as soon as you enter the room and signing you up for a course of something to help your body's unhelpful 'chemical imbalance'. The fact that you are there at all gives him the clue that you have a least a tiny anxiety problem and he can at least happily prescribe some toxic concoction to blow your mind away (and anything else of which it is capable) and up his status with Pharmaceutical Corp. and be sure to get his free Biro and lunch when the next batch of 'miracle' drugs arrives.

The State of the Art medical profession now sets up Internet web sites so that when the latest alleged/contrived 'pandemic' hits and the vaccine makers are working 25 hours a day to fill phials with untested filth, you will be able to telephone some 16 year-old kids, tell them your symptoms and they tell you (over the phone, for goodness sake!) that yes, you have the Ham Sandwich Virus and need to be vaccinated straight away. Your symptoms, by the way are the same as thousands of other people, all with different diseases!

Mentioning the Internet (and I am not assuming everyone is 'on' the Internet), you will probably be able to follow Doctor on Twitter, maybe. You know, one of those goodness awful 'social networking' sites, like Faceless Book, or whatever it is called. Imagine that! Then I may need to see a psychiatrist but would probably be diagnosed with A.S.N.S.S. (Anti-social Networking Site Syndrome) which would have been caused by a 'chemical imbalance' of an unbalanced 'mind'.


ADVICE (for what it is worth)

1.    Resolve issues as soon as possible after any traumatic incident, whatever it is. Cancers always follow unexpected severe traumas (conflicts). Any unexpected loss will cause a cancer of some kind, depending on your general health and whether you are male of female. Differing severe traumas will manifest themselves in varying types of cancer.

Cancers are not caused by 'carcinogenic' substances (including smoking tobacco; although no-one is claiming it is good for you!), they are caused by the brain reaction following sever traumas. Resolution of the conflict is essential to allow the body to heal itself of cancers (there are countless cases where cancers go away by themselves, sometimes called remission). A colleague once told me that one should never got to sleep in a conflict situation (for example, still having an argument with a spouse).

Cancers are never 'cured' by S.B.P. (Slash, Burn or Poison). They are 'cured' because the conflict that resulted in the 'cancer' was resolved. Cancer is not always a tumour that can be detected by some Man-made apparatus (e.g. an x-ray). If tumours are detected, the establishment of a conflict must be established and eliminated and the tumour regarded as a healing mechanism of the body-as-a-whole. When the resolution eliminates the conflict, the tumour will eventually be healed by the body and be removed without intervention from outside. Only in a life-saving situation where the whole body is compromised, may it be removed but that is a Human moral decision, not that of Nature.

However, the removal of any tumours may result in another type of cancer because of the trauma of the removal (Invasion of the Tumour Snatchers). Burke and Hare were pussy-cats compared with these surgeons devastations of a body, Human or otherwise). There is the notion of 'metastases'; that the cancer can 'spread'. Cancers can not and do not 'spread' (because they are not 'caused' by anything other than a specific trauma), they are initiated by other traumas to the body which are not resolved.

2.    Buy and use the best quality food you can which is as fresh as possible.

3.    Avoid processed food as much as possible.

4.    Never use fake butters and margarines, they are un-nutritious non-foods and are of no use to the body whatsoever.

5.    Avoid soy products. Unless properly fermented they are certainly not healthy for any creature.

6.    Avoid all artificial sweeteners (most fizzy drinks, especially those labeled 'Sugar Free' contain them), they are a desecration of the body. Chewing gum also contains Aspartame and/or other sweeteners, all seriously harmful. Stevia is a natural sweetener but is difficult to purchase.

7.    Avoid all Teflon and aluminium cookware, there are safe alternatives.

8.    Never, ever, use a micro-wave cooker for food or drink, recycle it responsibly as soon as possible, if you have one.

9.    Get as much sunshine as possible and gradually whenever you can. Never use sun-screen; just be sensible.

10.    If you can't get enough sun take 5000mg Vitamin D3 (natural capsules).

11.    Manage your sugar levels with Epsom Salts B.P. 1/3 teaspoon in warm water each day.

12.    Take Hemp 1000mg each day. You need all the Omega oils, not just Omega 3 (that is a sales ploy).

13.    Maintain a sense of humour as far as possible.

14.    Do not lead other people's lives, nor let them lead yours.
14a.    Regard television, newspapers, magazines (including 'scientific' or 'medical' ones), radio, most of the Internet as poor entertainment only. Apply no credence to 'governments', 'health officials' or anyone else trying to control your life. Do not include myself or this book as I am not trying to sell you anything, I am merely exchanging ideas in perfectly good faith.

15.    The eyes need natural daylight upon them. This does not mean stare at the sun. Even if you wear spectacles, you should remove them for some time as much as possible. The wearing of sunglasses should be avoided as much as possible. Most of them are not 'proper' lenses and can damage the eyes.

16.    Instead of wasting money on a lot of food that has no nutritional value (about 90% of stuff at shopping centers is non-nutritional, despite all the clap-trap to the contrary) spend it buying some fruit and vegetables and some decent meat. They may not be all they are cracked up to be but they are better than nothing.

I do not advocate silly diets. I do not advocate vegetarian/vegan/raw food and all that other stuff. Just eat the best you can, resolve issues; it is you responsibility.

Easy health is available with proper sunshine exposure, natural and sufficient nutrients, adequate rest for your body, reasonable exercise and a sense of humour. A week or two of this will prove what I have said. Have a copy of Desiderata on your wall. If you can get through a Winter without a 'cold' you will know you are a much healthier person. You don't 'catch' a cold from some-one, you manufacture it yourself by not being healthy. If you did 'catch a cold', we would all get them all the time...and some of us don't!
Nasty, nasty bugs, yechhh! But perhaps that is 'Buggist'?


Questions

It is very easy to accept the 'germ' theory as an explanation of why people get 'ill'. This is because this theory has unfortunately been with us for longer than the lifetime of any living person. It all seems to make sense in some unreal way.

I believe that  it is also an easy cop-out for those who refuse to take responsibility for their own health. If they use this excuse, (that there are 'germs' out there

© Copyright 2013sharpstuff All rights reserved. sharpstuff has granted theNextBigWriter, LLC non-exclusive rights to display this work on Booksie.com.