Welcome Visitor: Login to the siteJoin the site



Islam teaches that if a woman fed an adult male directly from her breast at least five times they would establish a family bond and thus be allowed to be alone together. Muslim scholar, Dr. Ezzat Attiyab, lecturer at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, confirmed this religious ruling. In fact, he issued a fatwa  that suggested that male and female colleagues could use breastfeeding to get around a religious ban on being alone together.

Submitted:Mar 14, 2013    Reads: 2,272    Comments: 0    Likes: 0   


Under Islamic law, in order to prevent sexual contact, men and women are forbidden to be alone together unless they are blood relatives. Therefore, men and women are not advised to stay in the same room if they are alone. However, it is obvious that the strict application of this Islamic law may cause some trouble and difficulties to daily life, particularly in the area of employment or business occupation. Thus, to circumvent this difficulty, Islam came up with one of the most shocking and controversial teachings - the breast-feeding of adults. The idea behind this ruling began when adoption was abolished in Islam. As for those women who already had adopted sons before this practice was abolished in Islam, Muhammad made a ruling that a mother-son-relationship can be established through breast-feeding. This included breast-feeding adult sons.

For the majority of the Muslims, this Islamic doctrine of breast-feeding adults comes as a shock. The usual Muslim reaction is, "What? No, we don't have this doctrine in Islam." But they do, and Islamic sources themselves prove it. Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Hadiths Number 3424, 3425 and 3427 state the incident which forms the basis for breast-feeding adult men in Islam. These authentic Hadiths, which is accepted by all Muslims, inform us that Muhammad commanded a married woman, Sahla bint Suhail, to breast-feed her adopted son, despite the fact that he was a grown man.

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3424:

'Ash reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah's Apostle and said: Messenger of Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa signs of disgust on entering of Salim into our house, whereupon Allah's Apostle said: Suckle him. She said: "How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man?" Allah's Messenger smiled and said: "I already know that he is a young man."

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3425:

'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (i. e. the daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said:Salim has attained (puberty) as men attain, and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that something (rankles) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa, whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her:Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said:So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3427:

Umm Salama said to 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her): A young boy who is at the threshold of puberty comes to you. I, however, do not like that he should come to me, whereupon 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) said: Don't you see in Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) a model for you? She also said: The wife of Abu Hudhaifa said: Messenger of Allah, Salim comes to me and now he is a grown-up person, and there is something that (rankles) in the mind of Abu Hudhaifa about him, whereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: suckle him (so that he may become your foster-child), and thus he may be able to come to you (freely).

For sure, Muslims struggle to contain the resulting shame of this teaching of Muhammad. However, since deception is part and parcel of Islam, it should not surprise us when we find Muslims misquoting other Hadiths, such as the one which states that kinship is limited to the suckling of a child for the first two years of his life, to try and invalidate the permissibility of breast-feeding adults in Islam. Nonetheless, the fact remains that Muhammad commanded a Muslim woman to breast-feed an adult male. This is an immoral and disgusting behavior in any society and under any circumstances.

Moreover, Islamic sources tell us that Aisha, the favorite wife of Muhammad, insists that a Qur'anic verse regarding breast-feeding to foster kinship is among the verses that are missing from theQur'an.This verse was presumably revealed to Muhammadto allow a male who is not a member of the immediate family to become one by suckling a female of that family.

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3421:

Narrated Aisha: It had been revealed in the Qur'an that ten clear sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah's Apostle (peace be upon him) died and it was before that time (found) in the Qur'an (and recited by the Muslims).

Based on the authority of this teaching, Aisha had her sister, Umm Kulthum, and nieces breast-feed men before meeting with her (Aisha). Thus, it can clearly be seen that the breast-feeding of adult males to foster kinship is an acceptable teaching in Islam. And honest Muslim scholars know that it so.

In 2007, Dr. (Sheikh) Ezzat Attiyab, head of Al Azhar University's Department of Hadith, issued afatwa, or Islamic legal decree, saying that female workers should "breast-feed" their male co-workers in order to work in each other's company.

BBC reported the following statements issued by Dr. Ezzat Attiyab in an interview:

If a woman fed a male colleague "directly from her breast" at least five times they would establish a family bond and thus be allowed to be alone together at work. "Breast feeding an adult puts an end to the problem of the private meeting, and does not ban marriage," he ruled. "A woman at work can take off the veil or reveal her hair in front of someone whom she breastfed." (Source: BBC)

Thus, Dr. Ezzat Attiyab acknowledged that this teaching is Islamic and it is legal in Islam for a woman to breast-feed any man, in order to work privately with him. He made his statement on Al Arabiya, saying that after five breast-feeding the man and woman could be alone together without violating Islamic law because the man becomes a symbolic relative of the woman, and therefore they could be alone and the woman could remove her headscarf to reveal her hair.

Dr. Ezzat Attiyab repeatedly declared that the sources he quoted in his fatwa belonged to the Islamic holy texts with the highest possible authority. According to him no less than 90,000 contemporary scholars confirmed that the Hadith he referred to is authentic. Among his many references, one was Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3425, which is cited above. Its worth noting, that Dr. Ezzat Attiyab is head of Al Azhar University's Department of Hadith in Cairo. The Al Azhar University is considered to be the world's most renowned Islamic university by all Muslims. It must also be noted that Dr. Abd Al-Mahdi Abd Al-Qadir, another Al-Azhar scholar, wrote and published a book rendering similar ideas based on the same Islamic sources.

Dr. Ezzat Attiyab also said:

"The adult must suckle directly from the woman's breast... (This is according to aHadithattributed to Aisha, wife of the Prophet's Muhammad), which tells of Salem the adopted son of Abu Hudheifa who was breastfed by Abu-Hudheifa's wife when he was already a grown man with a beard, by the Prophet's order…"

"The fact that theHadithregarding the breast-feeding of an adult is inconceivable to the mind does not make it invalid. This is a reliableHadith, and rejecting it is tantamount to rejecting Allah's Messenger and questioning the Prophet's tradition."(Source: Al-Watani Al-Yawm(Egypt), May 15, 2007.)

Not only did this revelation shock many Muslims but it was also an embarrassment to them. Muslim leaders quickly rushed to do some damage control to this authentic, yet otherwise shameful, teaching of Muhammad. They threatened Dr. Ezzat Attiyab to retract his statement and made him apologize for promoting the true teaching of Allah. They also made him say that his interpretation was reserved for exceptional cases. Since Dr. Ezzat Attiyab's fatwa was actually based on authentic Hadiths, no one could really demonstrate how his religious ruling was un-Islamic. His fatwa conformed to the strictures of Islamic jurisprudence. As a result, it was never truly disproved and it kept making comebacks.

In 2010, Shiekh Al Obiekan, an adviser to the royal cabinet and vice-minister of Justice of Saudi Arabia, also reiterated the above religious ruling. In an interview with the Arabic daily Asharq Al-Awsat, he specified that unrelated Muslim men and women could mix together so long as the man drank the woman's breast milk, thus creating a maternal bond between them. And another high-profile Islamic scholar, Sheik Abi Ishaq Al Huwaini, not only agreed with this religious ruling but also testified that men should suckle the milk directly from the woman's breast.

How could such an absurd teaching become part of the theology of Islam? It all started when Muhammad decided to marry Zainab, the beautiful wife of Zaid, his adopted son. Such a marriage union was entirely unacceptable under the prevailing laws of Arabia. However, in order to legitimize this disgraceful folly, Muhammad renounced the practice of adoption as un-Islamic, thereby removing the stain caused by his marriage to his adopted son's wife. The plan worked well for Muhammad but it created problems for many others.

As stated in the above Hadiths, Abu Huthayfa and his wife Sahla, had an adopted son (a freed slave) called Salim, who used to work and live in the house freely. As Salim was like a son to her, Sahla used to rely on him to help in the housework. She could stay with him in the same room without having to cover herself from his looks. When Muhammad made adoption unlawful, Salim suddenly became a stranger in the house and could no longer be alone with Sahla - his adopted mother. Sahla complained to Muhammad about the problems this new ruling created in her family. He immediately provided her with a brilliant solution. He asked her to breast-feed Salim, after which she would again be allowed to keep him as a son with her in the house. She responded, "But Salim is a man and has a beard!" Muhammad smiled and said, "I know that."

Islam at its most basic form consists of the Qur'an and Sunnah of Muhammad, which is recorded in the Hadiths. Islamic rules and regulations pertaining to all things originate from both the Qur'an and the Hadiths. Can Muslims still rely on these fundamental sources of their religion now that they find it an embarrassment? It is amazing to see how Muslim scholars use the teachings of one authentic Hadith to disprove the teachings of another authentic Hadith.

Here we find a woman who came to Muhammad with a problem and he gave her instructions how to solve it the Islamic way. He taught her how to make a non-related male permissible to be in her presence alone. There is absolutely nothing in the Sahih Muslim narration - as some Muslims claim - which would suggest that Muhammad's instruction was only limited to her, or to women in the exact same situation. The fact that the male was a freed slave who lived in the same house as a foster son and member of the family is of no consequence in Islam. Also the fact that it is permissible for a foster parent to suckle her adult foster child to make him permissible to be with her is in itself is disturbing. And Islam is disturbing.

We will now look at further evidences from Islamic sources:

Imam Malik's Muwatta, Book 30, Number 30.2.12:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that he was asked about the suckling of an older person. He said, ''Urwa ibn az-Zubayr informed me that Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba ibn Rabia, one of the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, who was present at Badr, adopted Salim (who is called Salim, the mawla of Abu Hudhayfa) as the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, adopted Zayd ibn Haritha. He thought of him as his son, and Abu Hudhayfa married him to his brother's sister, Fatima bint al-Walid ibn Utba ibn Rabia, who was at that time among the first emigrants. She was one of the best unmarried women of the Quraysh. When Allah the Exalted sent down in His Book what He sent down about Zayd ibn Haritha, 'Call them after their true fathers. That is more equitable in the sight of Allah. If you do not know who their fathers were then they are your brothers in the deen and your mawali,' (Sura 33 ayat 5) people in this position were traced back to their fathers. When the father was not known, they were traced to their mawla.

"Sahla bint Suhayl who was the wife of Abu Hudhayfa, and one of the tribe of Amr ibn Luayy, came to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him, and said, 'Messenger of Allah! We think of Salim as a son and he comes in to see me while I am uncovered. We only have one room, so what do you think about the situation?' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'Give him five drinks of your milk and he will be mahram by it.' She then saw him as a foster son. A'isha umm al-muminin took that as a precedent for whatever men she wanted to be able to come to see her. She ordered her sister, Umm Kulthum bint Abi Bakr as-Siddiq and the daughters of her brother to give milk to whichever men she wanted to be able to come in to see her. The rest of the wives of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, refused to let anyone come in to them by such nursing. They said, 'No! By Allah! We think that what the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, ordered Sahla bint Suhayl to do was only an indulgence concerning the nursing of Salim alone. No! By Allah! No one will come in upon us by such nursing!'

"This is what the wives of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, thought about the suckling of an older person."

As it can be noted, Aisha encouraged this practice as a means to overcome the problem of allowing non-related men to enter her house. This ruling came handy particularly after Muhammad's death because Aisha needed to meet and discuss with men about matters concerning Islam. Thus, Aisha was a strong advocate of this practice. She encouraged the daughters of her sisters and the daughters of her brethren to breast-feed those men whom Aisha wished to allow in her home. Muhammad's other wives refused to do that.

Due to the shame attached to this ruling, some Muslims falsely claim that the milk is not suckled directly from the woman's breast but is drunk from a container in which the milk of the woman is transferred. However, the Hadiths clearly convey the idea of literal breast-feeding and not as alleged by these Muslims that the milk is drunk from a container. Look at the following Hadiths:

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3428:

Zainab daughter of Abu Salama reported: I heard Umm Salama, the wife of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), saying to 'A'isha: By Allah, I do not like to be seen by a young boy who has passed the period of fosterage, whereupon she ('A'isha) said: Why is it so? Sahla daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah's Messenger, I swear by Allah that I see in the face of Abu Hudhaifa (the signs of disgust) on account of entering of Salim (in the house), whereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She (Sahla bint Suhail) said: He has a beard. But he (again) said: Suckle him, and it would remove what is there (expression of disgust) on the face of Abu Hudhaifa. She said: (I did that) and, by Allah, I did not see (any sign of disgust) on the face of Abu Hadhaifa.

Sunan Abu Dawud, Volume II, Book V, Number 2056:

The Prophet (may peace and blessing be upon him) said: Give him your breast-feed. She gave him five breast-feeds. He then became like her foster-son. (Sunan Abu Dawud English Translation with Explanatory Notes, by Prof. Ahmad Hasan, Volume II, Book V (Kitab al-Nikah), Number 2056)

The above Hadith clearly shows that Sahla gave Salim five breast-feeds, not breast milk in a cup. Dr. Ezzat Attiyab used this authorization given by Muhammad to issue his fatwa. In line with this teaching of Muhammad, he wanted women to breast-feed their male colleagues so as to avoid the sin of "khulwa" - staying alone with a stranger. The acceptance and denial of this teaching makes the difference between true Muslims who faithfully follow the footsteps of Muhammad and the hypocrites who deny or modify their religion. Allah judges such ones unfavorably.

Surah 28:50: But if they do not answer you, then know that they only follow their low desires; and who is more erring than he who follows his low desires without any guidance from Allah? Surely Allah does not guide the unjust people. (Shakir)

Imagine the thought of an adult sucking a woman's breast. Can it truly evoke in him a maternal feelings towards her? If anything, it could arouse unwholesome erotic feelings towards her. How on earth can Islam reason that to overcome the "sin" of being together, the woman must now expose her breast to a total stranger and allow him to suckle her breast? Is not the remedy worst than the cure? In addition to the obscene nature of this Islamic ruling, does not Muhammad know that women do not produce breast-milk on demand. They have to had given birth to a baby recently and breast-feed that baby daily. Otherwise, the milk will dry up within days.

Muslims are in denial. Muslim leaders deliberately and consistently hide the ugly face of Islam. The majority of Muslims do not know the magnitude of Muhammad's violations of accepted moral behavior. Right from infancy, Muslims are brainwashed to see only one side of Islam. Muhammad's absurdities, like the Hadiths above, are deliberately kept in the dark and out of reach of ordinary Muslims. That is why the majority of Muslims claim that Muhammad could have never allowed something like that. And they are wrong! They are ignorant!

In his commentary on this Islamic teaching, Dr. Ezzat Attiyab stated:

"The logic behind the concept of breast-feeding an adult is to transform the bestial relationship between two people into a religious relationship based on religious duties. Since breastfeeding takes place between two adults, the man is still permitted to marry the woman who breastfed him, whereas a woman who nursed a man in his infancy is not permitted to marry him."

Now we can understand why Islam speaks about two types of breast-feeding - the breast-feeding of those unrelated children below two years of age and the breast-feeding of unrelated adults. And according to this scholar, breast-feeding an adult as a means to overcome the sin of being alone with a man is a religious duty.

This absurd teaching of Muhammad has made Muslims the laughing stock of the civilized world. The issue of adult breast-feeding is embarrassing for Muslims. Instead of providing them with any sort of advantage or benefits, it places them, especially their women, in a ludicrous position. So why are some of the top Muslim scholars still advocating this disgraceful practice? Because it is an authentic Islamic teaching. Because Muhammad said so. And since it is contained in the teachings of authenticcanonical Hadith, topMuslimscholars view it as their responsibility to promote this perverse practice even today. After all, to reject it or any other canonical Hadith is to reject the sources and methodology that is essential to the formation of Islamic laws. In short, it means to reject the laws of Sharia. Thus, whether Muslims like it or not, they must accept this teaching as the word of Allah.

Muslims must ponder why Allah failed to address the fact that a woman exposing her breasts to an unrelated adult male to be suckled is a far greater violation of morality than simply being in his presence. As in the case of many other teachings, Muslims are divided on this issue. Muslims have difficulties discussing and accepting what Islam itself teaches. The fact is Islamic sources speak for themselves. Sometimes Muslims find that they have no greater enemy than their own scriptures - particularly the Hadiths which constantly embarrass them. They falsely claim that such Hadiths are weak Hadiths.

Of course, true Muslims are in complete agreement with this teaching of adult breast-feeding for an obvious reason. The reason is that it has a precedence in Islam. It was something that was taught by Muhammad and followed by Muslims during the early history of Islam. This ruling was never abrogated by Allah or Muhammad. The issue of whether this is morally acceptable or not has no relevance. Allah's and Muhammad's decision overrides the judgment of Muslims. Allah states the following in the Qur'an:

Surah 33:36: It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision: if any one disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path.

What is the point for Muslims to closely follow a religion that they have to rationalize to make it agreeable, minimize the damages it promotes, ignore some of some its teachings, reinterpret its meaning to make sense, lie to cover its absurdities, evade the issues it creates, and hide the shame it causes in today's civilized world? Muslims please wakeup!

The most destructive damage for ordinary Muslims comes not from those outside Islam but from within - from the lies that Muslim leaders feed them. Muslim leaders have learned the subtle art of hiding the ugly face of Islam. The have learned to hide in plain sight the shame of Islam.

The Importance of the Hadiths for Muslims

For more than 1200 years, Bukhari's collection of Hadith was - and still is - regarded by the majority of Muslims as only second to the Qur'an. Apart from the Qur'an, Muslims, especially the Sunnis regard the Hadith as the source of guidance. Hadith are narratives of the life of Muhammad, collected by scholars in the second and third century after the Hijra. The most famous and revered ones are those of Bukhari and Muslim.They are called Sahih which means correct, sound, authenticated because they went through a process of authentication.

However, when Christians use these very same Hadiths to expose the absurd teachings of Muhammad, Muslims will come up with numerous excuses. The most common among them are:

(1) This is a weak Hadith. (2) This is not an authentic Hadith.

If this is true, why are they still found in the compilations of the most authentic Hadiths of the Muslim world? Should not they be removed and discarded as fabrications? It is interesting to note what one Muslim scholar stated regarding the Hadith. Muslim scholar, Dr. Muhammad Hamidullah, states the following in his book, "Introduction to Islam," p. 163:

"The Qur'an and the Hadith are the basis of all (Islamic) law"

The reason according to Dr. Muhammad Hamidullah for Muslims to revere the Hadith as well as the Qur'an is that the Hadith is as divinely inspired as the Qur'an itself:

"The teachings of Islam are based primarily on the Qur'an and the Hadith, and, as we shall presently see, both are boasted on divine inspiration" (p. 23).

Therefore, orthodox Muslims consider the material in the Hadith as both authoritative and inspired. What the Qur'an teaches in black and white, the Hadith teaches in color. The greatest of all Hadith scholars is Al-Bukhari. Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan compiled a faithful English translation of Al-Bukhari's Hadith. His translation is recommended and approved by all Muslim authorities, including the spiritual heads of Mecca and Medina. The introduction states:

"It has been unanimously agreed that Iman Bukhari's work is the most authentic of all the other works in Hadith literature put together. The authenticity of Al-Bukhari's work is such that the religious learned scholars of Islam said concerning him: 'The most authentic book after the Book of Allah is Sahih-Al-Bukhari', p. xiv.

Dr. Khan does not hesitate to describe the Hadith as "the Second Inspiration." He also stated that it is "incumbent upon every Muslim to believe and to obey it." As it can be seen, the highest religious authorities of Islam view the Hadith as being inspired and authoritative. However, it is common to see many Muslims deny all this when they are confronted with some of the obviously absurd teachings of Muhammad. These Muslims, who minutes ago believed in the Hadith, will now turn around and say, "We Muslims only recognize the Holy Qur'an as God's Book. We do not accept the Hadith as inspired." Winning an argument means everything for them. They do not hesitate to lie. They do not stop to contemplate the seriousness of their action - their disowning of the Hadith just to claim a victory. They do this to prove the Christian wrong at all costs. We understand the dilemma of these Muslims. While they desperately want to maintain that Muhammad was a prophet of God, yet the Hadith clearly reveals that Muhammad could not be because he taught things which are not only obviously wrong but absurd.

When we view many of the things which Muhammad taught in the Hadith, we can clearly see that he was truly illiterate. Some of his beliefs were so far out that no one in his right mind could possibly accept or defend them today. Yet, sincere Muslims must do so or give up their claim that he was a true prophet of God. We understand their difficulty. How can they defend the indefensible? How can they justify what is so obviously absurd? This is the dilemma that Muslims face today. Having explained this, we will now look at some of the teachings of Muhammad that is recorded in the most authentic Hadith in the Muslim world - Sahih Al-Bukhari. The following teachings of Muhammad in the Hadith are a partial list of some of the strange things he taught to his disciples.


Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Hadith Number 543:

The Prophet said, "Allah created Adam, making him 60 cubits tall."

This would mean that Adam was around 90 foot tall. Was Adam really as tall as a three-story building? How tall was Eve? And what about their children? And as his descendants, why are we not that tall? What historical or scientific evidences are there for Muhammad to make this absurd claim? Can Muslims really defend this absurd teaching of Muhammad?


Sahih Bukhari, Volume 004, Book 054, Hadith Number 537:

Narrated By Abu Huraira: The Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it in the drink, for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease."

According to medical science, houseflies are recognized as carriers of easily communicable diseases. Flies collect pathogens on their legs and mouths when females lay eggs on decomposing organic matter such as feces, garbage and animal corpses. Houseflies carry diseases on their legs and the small hairs that cover their bodies. They carry germs of several deadly diseases and cause millions of deaths every year. Diseases carried by houseflies include typhoid, cholera and dysentery. Other diseases carried by houseflies include salmonella, anthrax, and tuberculosis. Houseflies have also been known to transmit the eggs of parasitic worms.

As we can see Muhammad was completely wrong. If a fly falls into a drink the most sensible thing to do is to throw away the drink. To further dip the fly into the drink as Muhammad suggested is insane. Furthermore, the parts of the fly that carry and transmit the diseases are mainly the legs and the small hairs that cover their bodies and not the wings as in the way Muhammad was trying to specify. And certainly there is no such thing as a cure on one of its wings and a disease on the other. Muhammad was trying to kill his disciples.


Sahih Bukhari, Volume 004, Book 054, Hadith Number 539:

The Prophet said, "Angels do not enter a house witch has either a dog or a picture in it."

And for this reason Muhammad ordered that the dogs should be killed.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 004, Book 054, Hadith Number 539:

"Allah's Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed."

We can find a collaborating Hadith in Sahih Muslim:

Sahih Muslim, Book 024, Hadith Number 5248:

Maimuna reported that one morning Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) was silent with grief. Maimuna said: Allah's Messenger, I find a change in your mood today. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Gabriel had promised me that he would meet me tonight, but he did not meet me. By Allah, he never broke his promises, and Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) spent the day in this sad (mood). Then it occurred to him that there had been a puppy under their cot. He commanded and it was turned out. He then took some water in his hand and sprinkled it at that place. When it was evening Gabriel met him and he said to him: you promised me that you would meet me the previous night. He said: Yes, but we do not enter a house in which there is a dog or a picture. Then on that very morning he commanded the killing of the dogs until he announced that the dog kept for the orchards should also be killed, but he spared the dog meant for the protection of extensive fields (or big gardens).

What a cruel, cruel man. Dogs are wonderful creatures. Dogs easily bond with humans. They protect humans and have them served in many ways. Just look at some of the occupations of this wonderful animal. They serve as Guard dogs, Police dogs, Search and Rescue dogs, Herding dogs, Hunting dogs and the list goes on. Dogs are kept as loving pets by non-Muslim people all over the world. No other animal looks to humans to find out what they are supposed to do but the dog. Muslims are missing out on this kind of unconditional love a dog gives because of their religion. Dog lovers would not make good Muslims.

Because of the evil teachings of Muhammad, dogs have a dark place in Islamic society. The question that we need to ask is, "Does it make any sense that Islam would despise this lovely, faithful and friendly animal?" "Does it make sense that God would create this wonderful animal only to have it hated so intensely?"

Humans may be scared of animals but can the same be said about powerful angels? This in itself shows the cruelty, stupidity and absurdity of this cult. Read the Hadith carefully. It clearly states that angels do not go into houses where there are dogs. What about the dogs that are on the outside? If the angels can come down to the earth where dogs roam freely, we must then ask why are the angels not affected by these dogs. If so why did Muhammad - with the exception of the dogs that he selfishly needed to protect his interest - ordered the killing of all dogs including those that are out in the orchids? What has that got to do with the angels not visiting a home that has a dog?


One bizarre teaching by Muhammad is his assertion that Satan literally stays in a person's upper nose at night and needs to be flushed out by snorting water in and out of one's nose three times! Of courses, Satan only lodges in the nose of Muslims.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 516:

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "If anyone of you rouses from sleep and performs the ablution, he should wash his nose by putting water in it and then blowing it out thrice,because Satan has stayed in the upper part of his nose all the night."

The footnote to this particular Hadith states:

(1) (H. 3295)We should believe that Satan actually stays in the upper part of one's nose, though we cannot perceive how, for this is related to the unseen world of which we know nothing except what Allah tells us through his Messenger. (Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan,The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 4. Ahadith 2738 to 3648, 59 - The Book of the Beginning of Creation, (11) CHAPTER. The Characteristics ofIblis(Satan) and his soldiers. p. 312)

We can find a collaborating Hadith in Sahih Muslim:

Sahih Muslim, Book 002, Number 0462:

Abu Huraira reported: The Apostle of Allah said. When any one of you awakes up from sleep and performs ablution, he must clean his nose three times,for the devil spends the night in the interior of his nose.

Imagine, because of this strange doctrine in Islam, Muhammad would suck in water up his nose and then blow it out because he believes that Satan stayed in his nose all night. How can Satan be in so many noses without being omnipresent?


In Arabic - forget the usual mantra about it being the beautiful language of the Qur'an - it says that the lamps in the sky (basically the stars) are missiles intended for shooting the demons. Astronomers should be particularly interested in this doctrine of Allah and Muhammad.

Surah 37:6-10: We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars,(For beauty) and for guard against all obstinate rebellious evil spirits,(So) they should not strain their ears in the direction of the Exalted Assembly but be cast away from every side,Repulsed, for they are under a perpetual penalty,Except such as snatch away something by stealth, and they are pursued by a flaming fire, of piercing brightness. (Yusuf Ali)

Surah 67:5: And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, andWe have made such (Lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire. (Yusuf Ali)

The Qur'an teaches that stars are fires set up in the sky to guard Heaven against demons. The demons want to hear what Allah is saying and so they try to sneak up to heaven. But when they do this, the protectors of Heaven will hurl stars at them to chase them off. There is a huge problem with this teaching since stars and shooting stars are not the same thing! Stars are giant balls of gas burning millions of miles away, and "shooting stars" are meteorites, or galactic debris that has entered the earth's atmosphere.

Surah 15:16-18: It is We Who have set out the zodiacal signs in the heavens, and made them fair-seeming to (all) beholders;And (moreover) We have guarded them from every evil spirit accursed:But any that gains a hearing by stealth, is pursued by a flaming fire, bright (to see). (Yusuf Ali)

Why would Allah want to shoot the demons? The Qur'an explains that the stars were made both as adornment for the skies and also as a guard against jinn. If a jinn were to somehow "gain a hearing by stealth" then it would be pursued by "a flaming fire." Thus, these stars serve at least two purposes: One, for adornment. Two, for launching at jinn. the second happens because the jinn attempt to hear something.

"We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars." This can never refer to meteorites. The problem is that Allah did not know the difference between meteorites and stars back then. To him they were basically the same thing. A star can either be fixed or transform into a shooting star. This of course makes no sense in modern science. But even if the Qur'an made the differentiation between stars and meteors (which it did not), it still does not explain how this passage can specifically refer only to meteorites. That's because meteorites move and do not beautify, nor act as lighting source for the night sky, therefore the stars cannot be associated to it.

So, it seems as if the Qur'an is saying that Allah (or angels) hurls stars (the ones that adorn the night skies) at demons when they try to hear the secrets of heaven. This implies that the stars go from being stationary to being launched, as we would expect a missile to work. The only thing that resembles a launched star is a meteorite. While Muslims try to lie and deny this straightforward teaching in the Qur'an, the Hadiths prove that Muhammad supports this clear-cut interpretation of the Qur'an.

Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith Number 5538:

As we were sitting during the night with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), a meteor shot gave a dazzling light.Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said:"What did you say in the pre-Islamic days when there was such a shot (of meteor)?"They said:"Allah and His Messenger know best (the actual position), but we, however, used to say that that very night a great man had been born and a great man had died," whereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said:"(These meteors) are shot neither at the death of anyone nor on the birth of anyone.Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, issues Command when He decides to do a thing.Then (the Angels) supporting the Throne sing His glory, then sing the dwellers of heaven who are near to them until this glory of God reaches them who are in the heaven of this world.Then those who are near the supporters of the Throne ask these supporters of the Throne:'What your Lord has said?'And they accordingly inform them what He says.Then the dwellers of heaven seek information from them until this information reaches the heaven of this world.In this process of transmission (the jinn snatches) what he manages to overhear and he carries it to his friends.And when the Angels see the jinn they attack them with meteors."

From this Hadith, we see that Muhammad agrees entirely with the conclusions that stars are used as missiles to shoot demons. The questions that we would like to ask Muslims is, "How can material objects have any effect the demons who are spirit creatures. The fact that demons can penetrate material things such as the body of human being and possesses them proves this point.

Not only does the Allah mistaken stars with meteors but also material with spirit.


Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Hadith Number 200:

Narrated Abu Huraira: That once he was in the company of the Prophet carrying a water pot for his ablution and for cleaning his private parts. While he was following him carrying it (i.e. the pot), the Prophet said, "Who is this?" He said, "I am Abu Huraira." The Prophet said, "Bring me stones in order to clean my private parts, and do not bring any bones or animal dung." Abu Huraira went on narrating: So I brought some stones, carrying them in the corner of my robe till I put them by his side and went away. When he finished, I walked with him and asked, "What about the bone and the animal dung?" He said, "They are of the food of Jinns. The delegate of Jinns of (the city of) Nasibin came to me--and how nice those Jinns were--and asked me for the remains of the human food. I invoked Allah for them that they would never pass by a bone or animal dung but find food on them."

Demons and Muhammad are friends. He even beseeched Allah on their behalf.


Muhammad believed that fever is caused by the heat from hell.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Hadith Number 483:

Narrated Abu Jamra Ad-Dabi: I used to sit with Ibn 'Abbas in Mecca. Once I had a fever and he said (to me), "Cool your fever with Zam-zam water, for Allah's Apostle said: 'It, (the Fever) is from the heat of the (Hell) Fire; so, cool it with water.


Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 71, Hadith Number 590:

Narrated Anas: The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered them to follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they followed the shepherd that is the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy.


Satan urinates into the ears of those who fall asleep during the time for prayers.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 51, Hadith Number 245:

Narrated 'Abdullah : A person was mentioned before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said, "Satan urinated in his ears."

What is more amazing than these absurd teachings in Islam is the fact that Muslims are willing to kill to kill and die for this absolute nonsense. Can any religion that teaches such absurd doctrines can come from the true God? Can Muhammad truly be a prophet of God? We do not think so!


| Email this story Email this Article | Add to reading list


About | News | Contact | Your Account | TheNextBigWriter | Self Publishing | Advertise

© 2013 TheNextBigWriter, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.