Attack By The Defacto Central Bank And The Corporations On The People's Half Of Congress

Reads: 75  | Likes: 0  | Shelves: 0  | Comments: 0

More Details
Status: Finished  |  Genre: Non-Fiction  |  House: Double Bar D
The claim is real, and can be observed right in Washington D.C. itself. The Civil War in reality, was a war of the entire American individual enterprise population against the self serving interests of the large corporations and the banks.

Submitted: June 09, 2017

A A A | A A A

Submitted: June 09, 2017

A A A

A A A


The First Dark Step Downward

 

 

iToItK13FZlOiT3tqGfsikejfAYAabREVHCwPQC-

Take note in this picture of Lincoln in the memorial at Washington D.C. taken by the author. Observe the manner in which he sits slightly to his own left. We may be justified in betting that fewer that one person in a thousand who visit the memorial ever notice what is about to be shown here. His gaze is dead ahead, rather than high or low. Our obvious conclusion here is that he is gazing directly at the Capitol Building, not the Washington Monument, as most people have always been informed for generations and readily presume as a consequence.

The fact that reveals the point of his gaze is exposed by standing directly with one's back to the figure of Lincoln at the position immediately beneath his head, gazing across the Washington mall area, where the materialization is readily noticeable that the most central point is the US Capitol building and it lies dead ahead, just adjacent to the left hand side of the Washington Monument, which is now apparent as not even standing in line with the figure of Lincoln. Such notations were made by the author in preparation for this work.

Other notations are of the very seat upon which Lincoln's effigy sits, taking on the picture more as a throne of incontestable rule, than just a seat of authority. The plebeian masses below are all forced to gaze upward, a sign of complete submission to their subjective position before the effigy of Lincoln in this photograph.

If Lincoln's effigy could turn it's head forty five degrees to his own left in this author's estimation, it would directly face The Federal Reserve building sitting just across the fairway from the pantheon. Hence we may observe that the message here is one of a dedicated memorial to a hero King elevated into the immortal, who not only conquered the American people on behalf of the centralized bank, but also the entire US Congress. Thus, if Lincoln could ever be resurrected from the dead159, he would rule as The Federal Reserve's anointed, immortalized figure head, incontestable omniscient flesh and blood god-King of all America, her precious resource base and her citizens, whom would then be commanded to give all in total submission unto this living breathing effigy of the once living person found in the historical figure of Lincoln.

For those whom are still contented to question these claims, then consider the following facts. A monument for Lincoln was in consideration since the time of his death. Six separate bills were drafted, beginning in 1901. Five of these bills were denied by the Speaker Of The House out of possible concern for the practicality of the issue in financial terms. In 1910, the same year that the plan for the Federal Reserve was drafted on Jekyll Island, Georgia, the sixth bill passed. A site was chosen with an informal ceremony in 1913, the same year that The Federal Reserve was legally born. Construction then began in February of 1914, as the FR began to settle itself into it's present position.

From the year of the site being chosen until construction was completed totaled approximately nine years. The question that this author asks is why, when the funds to construct the monument totaled only 3,000,000.00 dollars and the loan could then be taken out with the FR; with the bill now being charged back down to the American people starting in 1916, no doubt a design crafted into the FR plan at it's inception. Obviously money was not the true issue here and existence of the FR with it's coming income tax amendment being inserted into the US Constitution was why SOH, Cullum, changed his hard-line opposing stance to allow passage of the bill for constructing the monument.

The best conclusion for the answer to this question regarding the nine year construction period is that obviously the delay was intentional.160 Powers that be desired the construction to take nine years before completion, in the same manner that the original holy temple in Jerusalem took seven years to construct.

In classical Greek times pantheons were constructed to glorify gods; and in later Roman times, often to glorify men elevated into deified status as well. All the appearances here of Lincoln stand to be a covert bureaucratic effort in accomplishing the same on American soil. They must have been somewhat successful in their effort, since very few people, including professional scholars, even dare to question critically the Presidency of Lincoln. The feeling is allowed to prevail among the collective masses that somehow, Lincoln was the mortal exception above all others.

 

3jcF6LCOWZc5_2N7bfFfA5AJdCmzM4ZZX3vtyzRUrW9lSlK84AEgxPO_dctmFSZi2pLT3qN5R5rtccQVlHbTWDyWKKREfAOgvXLgGrfRIzSaU7ljOrGBBljpyr2HcDbQEU_AkXn4schQ-tmiFqaT9Tzzz6JkAqBn

In this photograph the author stands approximately halfway between the center of the US Capitol Building, and the Washington Monument. Take notice of the colonnaded figure on the ground just to the right of the Washington Monument. The center space would be where the figure of Lincoln sits, virtually in a direct line from the center of the US Capitol building, as indicated by the arrow point in the photograph.

Again the revelation here is that Lincoln's effigy does not face the Washington Monument, but the US Capitol building. This appearance of facing the Washington Monument that most assume, is merely a clever feign designed for the purpose of concealing the real truth in the entire affair concerning the Presidency of Lincoln. That truth was that the war Lincoln started against the plebeian masses was on behalf of the de facto central bank of New York, and the corporations that had grown up around it. The true purpose in any feign of liberation was to increase manpower in the Federal armed forces and to destroy the economic base that facilitated the Representative body who stood strong to demand checks on bank notes, and in between the government and the corporations supported by the bank.

In the end, not only did the corporations take over the land, but also the services offered back to the people on the ground, especially the service of lending money, since providing public access to financial resources was most profitable not only in the interest rates rendered, but also profitable for large mercantile enterprises in the fact that it allowed prices on commodities and product at the consumer level to remain high.

Proof that the war was motivated for the purpose of profiting to the bank comes in the notation of State issued currency being outlawed in 1863. State issued currency would have provided a hard check on Federal currency not backed by specie, especially if it was backed by gold and silver amounts equal in value to the stated amount on the bank notes. We may now comprehend the well founded reasoning behind the State of Texas calling for all of it's gold and the right to issue its own State currency in our present day and time.

As far as facts apply back down to us in this day and time, if we are to know the real truth, we are forced to make our way back to the original Constitutional documents, since all others have been designed to deceive. This means placing ourselves into a transportation device and traveling to the Smithsonian Institute of the National Archives in Washington D.C.. Here we shall find the original Constitutional document enshrined indefinitely beneath protective glass in a perfectly controlled environment.

The author noted that no person was allowed to take photographs of any sort in the rotunda area. One patron who violated the order was observed by the author as having his smartphone confiscated by security and the image promptly erased. The security guard also stated aloud that if the image could not have been located, then the smartphone would have been confiscated without return. While not allowing flash photography was understandable, since it has been proven that flash photography deteriorates aged paper, what this author questioned was the reason why non-flash photography was not allowed.

The obvious conclusion here is that something was being concealed that fear from above prompted the total photographic prohibition. Viewing was also timed,161 may be due to the large numbers of people at the shrine; but also to keep any truths from being deductively revealed to the citizens abroad, since it demands thought and time to view manifestations of the truth. Images transported from the building complex would have allowed for time to ponder the specifics, thus the real truth would have then manifested itself. The images would have also conflicted with distributed outside images of the Constitution, which have only been designed to maintain the continuing hoax.

 

 

N2-4XsVhRje_5pkmbHBBYzceYRxK2ewZBD8Mg-jE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below is a view of the Archives Rotunda area.162 This 2002 photograph has been released into public domain, and was located by the author in the Wikipedia article on the NARA. The Rotunda appears about the same today. As was stated earlier, no photographs of any type were allowed of the actual Constitutional document. Guards were positioned on each side of the document and in front of the display, carefully taking note of every person's exact move to make certain that no person violated the order forbidding photography of any sort.

 

w2HKOYghGBg1Z0gyyPXULJNOpaqXb2D-OUdqT3o6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since the documents are aged and the writing faded, as well as the style of handwriting from the day of signature being difficult to read, one is forced to exit the National Archive building and walk up the street a block to the Museum Of American History.163 If one makes his way down the avenue where Washington's tent is and his false teeth are, and the place where the artifacts from the Revolutionary war lie, at the end of the corridor is a chamber with an inflated photograph of the original Constitutional document hanging up to cover the wall on the left hand side, and an inflated copy printed in clearly legible modern day print on the right hand wall from it.

Here we are compelled by the image before us to take special notice of the Tenth Amendment in particular. The Constitutional document delegates authority to the Federal Government, and no authority specifically delegated to the Federal Government, goes directly to the States and/or the people. Where is the order denying people the right to divorce from the Union Of States, should the Federal government make commands that violate the Constitution and the collective will of the people in majority?

In short, for any authority at anytime to conclusively declare that states do not have the right to succeed from the Federal union by majority vote, is to say on the same breath that the Federal government has the right to abuse individual rights, state rights conjunctive with a flagrant violation of Constitutional law; and all that the people within individual states have a right to do is to simply tolerate this crass abuse in complete silence with blind submission. The right of states to succeed is simply a solid check on what is obviously destined to be self-serving elitist Federal authority, as would be any unchecked authority, corporate or governmental.

Let us remain aware that such ideology of blind submission to unchecked authority is inherently not a part of the American tradition, no matter how much it is that any national or certain state leadership may wish it to be so, or the US would have never divorced itself from Great Britain. When leadership attempts to convince the United States citizen base otherwise, then what type of rule are they really attempting to force down upon the people of the nation? These are very serious questions that individual American citizens will most certainly need to ponder in the coming years, probably more so than at any other time since the US Civil War. Again, the very survival of the freeborn American nation is at stake!

Photograph provided by wikipedia, and notated as coming directly from the NA.

(Amendment 1 - Freedom of expression and religion)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

(Amendment 2 - Bearing Arms)

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

(Amendment 3 - Quartering Soldiers)

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

(Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure)

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

(Amendment 5 - Rights of Persons)

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

(Amendment 6 - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions)

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

(Amendment 7 - Civil Trials)

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

(Amendment 8 - Further Guarantees in Criminal Cases)

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

(Amendment 9 - Unenumerated Rights)

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

(Amendment 10 - Reserved Powers)

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To bear witness to astonishing revelations of the truth, we are once again compelled to make one last journey to the Civil War corridor located inside the National Museum Of American History. As we make our way through this corridor, we will pass artifacts from the battle of Gettysburg and the Emancipation Proclamation document. Just adjacent to the document is a gift shop where one may purchase exact copies. We keep on going past this, into the final chamber of the corridor. Here we may observe on the wall a notation of Constitutional alteration entitled “The Amended Constitution To Preserve The Union.”

Here again, we may observe the most striking, astonishing details of what it was that really took place during this conflict, and that which the citizens of America in reality lost, rather than gained, as they have been intentionally misled to believe for so many generations now. Take notice again of the tenth amendment and how it was conceptualized throughout the legislative branch almost immediately following conclusion of the US Civil War. In the amended version the actions taken by the Federal Government when rendered into wording strongly appear to read as such:

The Constitution delegates authority to the Federal Government and the Federal Government down to the States and the people.

Recall the National Banking Act of 1863 literally forcing centralized currency on to the States, effectively eliminating any form of check on the de facto central bank of the day164, which would regroup to manifest itself later in time as The Federal Reserve.

One of the most important notations is that of the Thirteenth Amendment. The Thirteenth Amendment did not outlaw slavery and feigned a permanent prohibition by stating that slavery would be allowed to exist henceforth only according to determination by legitimate court of law as penalty for crime. Tyrannies use finance to take over nations, and legitimate rule of law is virtually always replaced by an imposing inquisition. The conclusion here is that the check in regard to the court was intended to provide a false sense of security to the people, and a path of manipulation to the corporations working with the legal system at large, if the desire to do so should ever predominate, as was the original intention when this amendment was conceived to facilitate the transfer of legalized slavery from the individual person over into the hands of government and corporation.

At the same time, take notice of the fourteenth amendment enacted in July of 1868, barely three years following the US Civil War. Any person searching for more validation of the Federal government making heavy use of recruited foreign soldiers for the purpose of displacing the citizen base who held to views in respect to the Constitution by offering them citizenship in return for signing up on a military roster, simply take notice of this amendment.

It was well known by Federal officials that citizens in the Southern states165 would seek vengeance on these former agents of the enemy who had made war against them, wantonly destroying their hard won property; these same villains who engaged in outright depraved criminal activity against its non-military civilians during the time of total warfare.

The idea in initiating the vendetta that the Federal government well knew was forthcoming would be to expel or outright eliminate these agents of the negative, since the war against forces of the de facto centralized bank was not over with in the minds of the Anglo-Southern masses at large, who simply refused to forbear the American made ideology of individual economic liberty with the surrender of Lee at Appomattox. This amendment also catered to corporate use of foreign labor by disdaining those who would design to work against it, regardless of where it was in the nation that these contesting groups might hail from.

The same rule of logic applied to former slaves, which is why the Fourteenth Amendment made in direct appeal to their interests. As we shall recall, the Federal Government also compelled the service of ex-slaves via the Emancipation Proclamation, heavily encouraging military service in doing so. These individuals were also virtual Federally sanctioned criminal agents of the total warfare effort on the Southern home front, as far as citizens of the states in rebellion against the central bank were concerned. When the war ended, rather than settle in the Northern States, the traitorous ex-slaves and Federal combat veterans remained on Southern soil, living among their very neighbors whom they had so savagely made war upon with Federal encouragement, while hoping among themselves to benefit from purloined resources falsely promised by the US Federal government.166

Hence, the USFG and its agents knew well that the same vendetta response was forth coming, and by 1868 had already commenced in lieu of the US Federal government's near bankrupt status quo,  and it's inability to engage a valid program of security on its newly conquered soil as a result. The western states, including the west of Tennessee, for example, were being ran by pro-confederate guerrilla forces, assembling a form of police protection and criminal prosecution. This prevailing lawless situation of contesting citizenry left the Anglo-South in a position where it possessed no alternative choice but to provide for it's own security via a series of paramilitary organizations,167 pursuing the guilty culprits in the most efficient manner available, considering the lawless circumstances of the time. Examine the text of the Fourteenth Amendment here:

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Examine the text of the fifteenth amendment which appears to conjunct with the FA here copied from Wikipedia:

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.168

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

There again, in both sections one and two, we may vividly observe the Federal Government's appeal to allegiance made back down to the ex-slaves, whom they well knew would certainly have their basic citizenship rights wrested away inside states where their former enemies resided on land which these same former enemies felt held no allegiance to any Federal cause; that Federal cause being total support for the national and international bankers in their efforts against the representative body standing between their own self-serving interests and the US citizen base on the ground. Largely uneducated ex-slaves and illiterate foreigners held no understanding whatsoever of any concept in individual economic liberty broadly speaking, let alone the notion of a central bank and its supporting representative base standing as a collective absolute authority, and what this would certainly mean to all future interests of the individual American citizen at large.

In addition, the fifteenth amendment was conceived in the ideology that by making this appeal to allegiance, the elitist were serving their own personal interests via the new votes that they were certain to garnish from both new foreign ex-veteran soldiers and former ex-veteran slaves, rendering them and their own interest concerns a certain majority.

In other words, an initial example of placation to one or two demographic sides by claiming some allegorical wrong justified persecution of the other side, who were categorized as being historical villains. We must also recall that foreigners by the virtual million hord were encouraged to enter into the nation through the point of entry at Ellis Island, New York, almost immediately following conclusion of the US Civil War, creating a continuing displacement of those who held a blood heritage with the US Constitution, and would continue to question developmental events of the times favoring  banking and their corporate entities.

In short, to give final analysis and to repeat the conclusion summarized in part one: we are forced to recall that the first shots of the US Civil War were compelled by John McGowan, the captain of the Federal steamer, Star Of The West, anchored in Charleston Harbor, steaming ahead to supply military installations there in direct violation of orders to hold169 issued from President Buchanan, as a result of his unwritten agreement170171 with governor Pickens of South Carolina.172 We must always recall that the shipment path of TSOTW was virtually the exact path once held by the SS Central America, bringing gold to the Bank Of New York from the California gold fields. Agents at the de facto central bank and Federal government officials well knew of every detail in regard of the ship's anchor location and the captain who commanded it. A callous Mafioso styled threat would have succeeded in motivating McGowan to violate any sort of presidential order to remain anchored.

With the National Banking Act Of 1863 loudly rejected by Southern States from the time of its first suggestion in the late 1850's, all forms of checks on US currency were eliminated in its final passage, since by the time NBA was enacted the Federal authorities were relatively certain that it was simply a matter of continuing calculated endurance and attack on multiple fronts before the South fell. Thus all US states were subjected to the same non-backed centralized currency issued by the Treasury and the Bank Of New York , a currency intentionally created where it's value could be dictated at the whim of the elitist few who ran this de facto central bank of the day. The reason that individual states were allowed to produce their own currency beforehand was that tyrannies use finances to seize control of a nation and its citizens, hence state production of their own currencies provided a hard check on any manipulation of one single currency.

Individual people were allowed to own banks because money lending at interest is the surest method of attaining true wealth. A problem for the banking elites and their accompanying corporate interests is that it would also facilitate an eventual creation of an unsuppressed plebeian financial class, who would stand to compete with the interests of the national banking elites inside the American homeland; and just maybe abroad as well, should this development of plebeian financial independence be allowed to flourish uncontested.

As was intimated earlier in this work, legalized slavery was simply transferred from the hands of the individual, over into the hands of the government and corporation, upon extermination of the opposing representative body from the halls of US Congress. We make this deduction because it is the large corporations, state and the Federal government who owns and manages the prison system down into our present time, especially as it increasingly morphs with the passage of time into a thriving industrialized component. Demand for compelled labor with little or no lose in the corporate profit margin, could very possibly soon outstrip the supply, especially in lieu of an intentional currency crash or dramatic value reduction by the present day Federal Reserve System. Compelled labor was...and still is... the most profitable commodity owned by any nation on earth. A false check was put into place with the statement “except as punishment to be determined by court of law.”

The intentional assumption in this false check is that there would always exist a legitimate court of law, where condemnation would be supported by hard facts. During times of tyranny the first element to melt away is legitimate rule of law, virtually always replaced by inquisition, which occurs in one of two forms; either political or religious. Present day facts materializing on the ground173 suggest that any emergence of the first could possibly transform with passing of time into the second at the Federal level, who would then force any accommodating conditions back down on the individual states. All that was to be needed now for a complete corporate conquest of America, it's precious privately held resource base and it's entire plebeian citizen base would be for the emergence of a corporate backed tyrant, who was destined to be facilitated via another spectacular distraction in the looming future, yet far distant from conclusion of the US Civil War. This distance in time resulting from the raw might of Southern resolve and a series of near back to back historical catastrophe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


© Copyright 2017 H.L. Dowless. All rights reserved.

Add Your Comments: