Internalizing the Word of God

Reads: 1254  | Likes: 0  | Shelves: 0  | Comments: 1

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Invite

More Details
Status: Finished  |  Genre: Religion and Spirituality  |  House: Booksie Classic
Internalization does not require new-man function to internalize truth. Neither the “old-man” nor “new-man” are in view when internalizing the Word of God because neither are part of the decreed requirement for the internalizing process. It’s the neutral soul that processes the internalization of truth.

Submitted: October 22, 2010

A A A | A A A

Submitted: October 22, 2010

A A A

A A A


INTERNALIZING THE WORD OF GOD
 
Thesis: Truth internalized on its way to the new-man’s clothes closet requires two things:
 
1)rebound
2)desire for truth
 
Thesis expanded: Internalization does not require new-man function to internalize truth. Neither the “old-man” nor “new-man” are in view when internalizing the Word of God because neither are part of the decreed requirement for the internalizing process. It’s the neutral soul that processes the internalization of truth.
 
Intake vs. Application
 
 1.Internalization deals with the intake of truth.
 2.Actualization deals with the application of truth.
 3.It’s the difference between incoming and outgoing.
 
Intake and Application Requirements Differ
 
 1.  Internalization of truth requires rebound and desire for truth.
 2. Actualization of truth requires new-man status, the result of the believer’s function in “Operation KRRY.”
 3. The difference between these requirements is determined by divine decree.
 
Desire Described
 
The word “desire” means more than “Oh, yeah, sure, I would like to know the truth.” How about this? If you want to continue to live your physical life, how much do you desire your next breath?” The intensity with which you desire the internalization of God’s truth should be the same as the intensity with which you desire your next breath. By divine decree, it is this type of desire coupled with rebound that allows the neutral soul to internalize truth into your reference center through the ear gate, eye gate, or tactilely and further internalize that incoming truth into your human spirit where the Holy Spirit can teach you.
 
Thesis Rationale
 
 1. I have formerly taught the following ideas progressively, first this for a period of time, then this for a period of time, and now this as the requirement for internalizing the Word of God:
 
1)first this:  rebound as the only requirement (1 John 1:9)
2)then this:  rebound followed by function in “Operation KRRY” (1 John 1:9 + Romans 6:6, 11, 13)
3)now this: rebound with an attitude of desire/wanting to want the truth in God’s Word. (1 John 1:9 + 1 Peter 2:2 cp. Philippians 2:13)
 
 2.Ways to view these three statements in number 1 under “Thesis Rationale:”
 
1)#1 is right; 2 and 3 are wrong.
2)#2 is right; 1 and 3 are wrong.
3)#3 is right; 1 and 2 are wrong.
4)All three are wrong.
5)#’s 1 is incomplete; in #2, “Operation KRRY” is misplaced in the process; but both #1 and #2 represent a progression in the learning experience leading to #3, each progression representing a more clear understanding than the previous one.
 
 3.I believe that #5 most clearly represents my present viewpoint.
 
 4.Ways to view my present viewpoint:
 
1)He’s gone too far and has finally gone astray.
2)I hear what he’s saying, but I don’t agree with him.
3)I hear what he’s saying, but I’m not sure I agree with him.
4)I hear what he’s saying, and I’ll give more thought to what he is saying.
5)I hear what he’s saying, and I agree with him.
 
 5. Point of clarity: Some say pejoratively, “He thinks he’s always got to be right.” God help me if that’s the case. Actually, I seek truth. If I find it, that will make me right. A person can think he is right when he may be wrong. That’s why I seek truth, not rightness.
 
 6. In the interest of knowing the truth, I stand ready to listen to any logical argument that suggests that my thesis is incorrect.
 
 7. Three basic assumptions:
 
1)“Operation KRRY” is truth.
2)“Operation KRRY” is a four step process that must be learned before it can be applied.
3)“Operation KRRY” when learned can be applied to place the believer “in the sphere of the Spirit” from which sphere new-man function occurs.
 
8.Given these basic assumptions, I believe that any logical argument intending to disprove my thesis, must address the following questions:
 
1)If truth cannot be applied until learned, and if truth can be learned only while functioning from the new man, how can a believer learn the four step process of “Operation KRRY” if “Operation KRRY” is the means of accessing the new-man from which all learning is supposed to occur?
 
2)If the new-man must function to learn truth, how can the new-man learn truth before the new-man is accessed?
 
3)How can the concept of “Operation KRRY” be learned if “Operation KRRY” activates the only means by which “Operation KRRY” can be learned?
 
4)How do you explain all of the doctrine internalized by doctrinally-oriented people before they have ever heard of “Operation KRRY?”
 
5)Does not the neutral soul functioning under rebound and desire for the truth offer the reasonable means of internalizing truth on its way to the new-man clothes-closet after the previous four questions are answered honestly?
 
There are other questions that might be asked, but these are sufficient with which to begin.
 
Thesis restated: Truth internalized on its way to the new-man clothes closet requires two things:
 
1)rebound
2)desire for truth


© Copyright 2020 drjim. All rights reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Invite

Add Your Comments:

More Religion and Spirituality Articles