WANKER PRESS

Poem by: Philip Roberts

Summary

In 2009 I sent a poetry collect for consideration to a name publisher, who sent me an almost obscene rejection slip, saying my work was so awful they would destroy unread anything else I sent them. As co-incidence (I'm sure!) would have it, the next day I received an unsolicited invitation from a vanity publisher to publish a collection of my work at my expense. Co-incidence? My collection had 39 poems and the vanity publisher said, "We accept any manuscript from 39 pages upwards." The catch is my manuscript was actually 51 pages, since some poems were 2 pages, but their minimum length matched the number of poems. I must conclude the once honourable name publisher had degenerated into touting for the vanity publisher (or indeed owned the vanity press). Clearly they thought the more discouraging their poison-pen-rejection slip was, the more likely I was to waste my money on vanity publishing.

Content

Submitted: January 20, 2011

A A A | A A A

Content

Submitted: January 20, 2011

A A A

A A A


I just received an email
Address from Wanker Press,
They said they read my manuscript
And it was too shithouse to access.

They won’t publish a Poet of the People
‘Forget the fucking Prols!’
At Wanker Press they told me
‘We have much loftier of goals.’

‘We aim to please the critics
Newspapers, and other cretins,
As for rhyming poets, well....
We just won’t let them in.

‘We have standards to keep down
We must not let them rise,
We’re aiming low to please the critics
We’re not aiming for the skies.

‘Imagine Pablo Picasso as a bloody awful poet
Instead of a bloody awful painter,
That’s the shit that the critics like
The crowd for whom we cater.

‘Don’t send us your rhyming muck
Which has a clear, precise message,
We like obscurist, verbose crap
That keeps the punters guessing.

‘Don’t try to improve the world through rhyme
We like it lousy, as it is,
Don’t fill our emails with your sweet wine
We’re used to drinking donkey piss.

‘It’s not for nought they call us
“That bloody Wanker Press!”
We won’t publish any cream
We want fifth ... not second best!’

THE END
© Copyright 2011
Philip Roberts


© Copyright 2016 Philip Roberts. All rights reserved.

WANKER PRESS WANKER PRESS

Status: Finished

Genre: Literary Fiction

Houses:

Details

Status: Finished

Genre: Literary Fiction

Houses:

Summary

In 2009 I sent a poetry collect for consideration to a name publisher, who sent me an almost obscene rejection slip, saying my work was so awful they would destroy unread anything else I sent them. As co-incidence (I'm sure!) would have it, the next day I received an unsolicited invitation from a vanity publisher to publish a collection of my work at my expense. Co-incidence? My collection had 39 poems and the vanity publisher said, "We accept any manuscript from 39 pages upwards." The catch is my manuscript was actually 51 pages, since some poems were 2 pages, but their minimum length matched the number of poems. I must conclude the once honourable name publisher had degenerated into touting for the vanity publisher (or indeed owned the vanity press). Clearly they thought the more discouraging their poison-pen-rejection slip was, the more likely I was to waste my money on vanity publishing.

Add Your Comments:

Other Content by Philip Roberts

Add picture

Paste the link to picture in the entry below:

— or —

Drag a picture from your file manager into this box,
or click to select.

Add video

Paste the link to Youtube video in the following entry:

Existing Comments:
Bad selection

Cannot annotate a non-flat selection. Make sure your selection starts and ends within the same node.

(example of bad selection): This is bold text and this is normal text.
(example of good selection): This is bold text and this is normal text.
Bad selection

An annotation cannot contain another annotation.

Anonymous
Really delete this comment?
Anonymous
Really delete this comment?

There was an error uploading your file.


    
Anonymous